When Lobbies Duel


How full of disinformation must one’s head be, how deeply in denial must one be to ignore the obvious?

Mark Frauenfelder, “How the CIA created the Unabomber,” BoingBoing, 9 May 2014:


Alston Chase, “Harvard and the Making of the Unabomber,” Atlantic, June 2000:



Zbigniew Brzezinski and Osama bin Laden

Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway, “From U.S., the ABC’s of Jihad,” Washington Post, 23 March 2002:


Historycommons, “1984-1994: CIA Funds Militant Textbooks for Afghanistan”:


Fauzia Nouristani, “USAID –Politics of Aid and Education in Afghanistan,” Education Policy Talk, 19 March 2014:


Some of the examples of the books distributed by USAID clearly show the US policy agenda: “If out of 10 atheists, 5 are killed by 1 Muslim, 5 would be left. 5 guns + 5 guns = 10 guns; 15 bullets – 10 bullets = 5 bullets, etc.” (Stephens and Ottoway, 2002). These books educated generations of Afghan refugee children to know nothing but war and violence.

Glenn Hefley, “How Generations Were Raised to believe in jihad,” GHefly.com, 6 July 2015:


The MKULTRA subproject for mass conversion FOIA.

And just so you can see how old and widespread the problem of deceit is with regards to warfare and the question of “whodunnit,” an incredible list of false-flag type narratives spanning the globe and the past century:

Washington’s Blog, “False Flag Terror. A Historical Overview,” via GlobalResearch, 11 September 2015:



GOP and the NRA/gun lobby:

New York Times editorial board, “Republicans and the Gun Lobby,” 14 April 2012:


Mark Ames, “A brief history of American gun nuts,” Pando, 26 June 2015:


Though also very important to note that you cannot go entirely by party:

Robert Costa, “GOP’s Rep. [Peter] King Calls for More Background Checks in Wake of Calif. Killings,” Washington Post, 25 May 2014:


And based on the same article:

NRA-IL, “Rep. Peter King Calls for More Gun Control,” 27 May 2014:


DNC – Obama’s major donors = big pharma:

Ben Comer, “Pharma Donors Favor Obama,” Medical Marketing & Media, 15 August 2008:


Over $24M all told from health professionals overall not counting any of unknown “Retired”:

OpenSecrets, Barack Obama {D}, Industries, 2008 cycle, 2012 cycle:



Lots more:



What came out of it? Guess.

The drug lobby is pushing for more drugs to “fix” our shooter problem:

Joe Khalil, “Issue of Mental Health Part of National Discourse Again Following Oregon College Shooting,” Fox 40 Sacramento, 2 October 2015:


Despite the obvious in some/not all cases, but especially Columbine, that some of these people were well-drugged at the time they went postal:

Dan Roberts, “Every Mass Shooting Shares One Thing In Common & It’s NOT Weapons,” Ammoland, 1 April 2013:

Eric Harris age 17 (first on Zoloft then Luvox) and Dylan Klebold aged 18 (Columbine school shooting in Littleton, Colorado), killed 12 students and 1 teacher, and wounded 23 others, before killing themselves. Klebold’s medical records have never been made available to the public.


Supporters of the drug lobby are pushing for more gun control:

Matt Vespa, “Obama Says Gun Violence ‘Is Something We Should Politicize’ In Statement about Oregon Shooting,” Townhall, 1 October 2015:


And supporters of the gun lobby are pooh-poohing drugs and calling for more guns to protect ourselves from the crazies:

David Edwards, “Less than 90 minutes after Oregon shooting, CNN analyst suggests school’s ‘gun free zone’ to blame,” Rawstory, 1 October 2015:


Less than two hours after massacre at Umpqua Community College on Thursday, CNN military analyst Rick Francona suggested that the shooter had chosen the location because it was a gun free zone.

Note that this is a win-win situation for our criminal elite: More guns or drugs = more kickbacks; less guns and drugs means more control since only cops and mercenaries will be armed and more “crazies” for all of us to fear so we’ll be begging armed sadists to protect us. Perfect recipe for fascism no matter how you slice it.


Additionally, the 3-D chess move that really gives away CIA’s involvement with the shooting, regards 4Chan, one of those places where members of anonymous would hang out because literally everyone who uses it is anonymous except for the administrator.

Jason Silverstein, Larry Mcshane, Nancy Dillon, “Madman kills nine, injures seven after shooting at Umpqua Community College in Oregon,” NY Daily News, 2 October 2015:


Several message boards noted the shooter may have revealed his plans Wednesday night, in posts on the website 4chan.

“Some of you guys are alright. Don’t go to school tomorrow if you are in the northwest,” one post reads.

“happening thread will be posted tomorrow morning…so long space robots…Will post again in the am. 10 min countdown. Won’t say more to much to prepare (sic)”

4Chan is therefore a government target due to association with Anonymous.

And let’s not forget the sockpuppets. Recall again NTrepid’s system reported on by Barrett Brown:

Patrick McGuire, “Why Is Barrett Brown Facing 100 Years in Prison?,” Vice, 31 January 2013:


Alongside Abraxas and Cubic on those tax filings is another company called Ntrepid. According to Florida State’s records of corporations, Richard Helms is the director of that company. In 2011, Barrett’s work helped lead the Guardian to their report that Ntrepid won a $2.76 million-dollar contract from Centcom (U.S. Central Command), to create “online persona management” software, also known as “sockpuppetry.” To break it down in plain English, online persona management was created to populate social networks with a bunch of fake and believable social media personas to “influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda.”

Ntrepid also has a product they call Tartan, that’s detailed in this internal presentation hosted by the Wall Street Journal. In Ntrepid’s own parlance, they describe Tartan as a program that can “Analyze illicit organizations and less structured social networks by identifying: Ranks of influence within human networks… [and can] end the use of [online] aliases.” Clearly they are looking to dismantle the smoke and mirrors that groups like Anonymous maintain, by hanging out in chatrooms where they do not need to identify themselves officially, with many private communications happening at once. This creates a difficult to penetrate den, where people can easily hide online. Evidently, Ntrepid is seeking to pull all of that apart with Tartan.

What they really mean is

1} Create phony online consensus as a means of creating peer pressure in order to achieve the goals of the Deep State/military industrial complex.

2} To identify whistleblowers so that the criminal elite can continue manipulating and stealing without hiccups.

Let’s get something clear. The purpose of the 2nd amendment was never for hunting, nor was it for protecting your home from burglars. It was always to prevent illegal seizure of your property by the government, as a check on Congress’ standing army in case tyranny should take over. At the time British soldiers were well in the minds of the framers. They had taken over homes as if they owned them, much like the House of Saud does in its own country. And, like how Blackwater behaved during Sandy:

Jamie Wilson, “Mercenaries Guard Homes of the Rich in New Orleans,” Guardian, 12 September 2005:


What they leave out is how they broke into homes, threw furniture in the street, and set up headquarters and sleeping quarters wherever they damn well pleased.

Jeremy Scahill, “Overkill: Feared Blackwater Mercenaries Deploy in New Orleans,” DemocracyNow, 12 September 2005:


Yes, that’s right. And they also alleged that they had been deputized. And another key point is that these Blackwater guys said that they were given the authority to use lethal force, as well as the power to make arrests. And when we asked them about this use of them in the United States, they said that they believe that we’re going to see a lot more of this and that this is a trend. So, I think that this is a very, very disturbing development that we are seeing here on the streets of New Orleans, Amy.

And let’s not forget the unconfirmed words of the American Sniper:

Terrence McCoy, “The ‘unverifiable’ legacy of Chris Kyle, the deadliest sniper in American history,” Washington Post, 30 July 2014:


“…He and another sniper traveled to New Orleans, set up on top of the Superdome, and proceed to shoot dozens of armed residents who were contributing to the chaos.” The magazine said one conversation participant said Kyle “claimed to have shot thirty men on his own,” while another said Kyle and the other killed 30 between them.

Of course, they primarily mean black people trying to eat.

This was not a lone wolf shooter but rather the employee of an organization that engages in drug running, mass murder and surveillance, torture, protecting corporations who fund terrorism, assassinating and making political prisoners of journalists, and has lied about every one of these things.


John Vibes, “FBI Report: Americans Less Violent than Ever, Except for Police,” Free Thought Project, 12 November 2014:



The Interrupted Democracy

“…I wondered fleetingly, if [the Hills’] interracial marriage might be involved in Mr. Hill’s disturbance.”

“Will plays no part whatever in hypnosis, and the belief that hypnotizability is a manifestation of a weak will is false. The factors which influence hypnotizability are the intelligence of the individual, his conscious willingness, and the unconscious resistance or submissiveness. The latter are not always manifest on the surface…”

–Benjamin Simon, MD

Continue reading

A Brief on the Evolution of Assassination and Poisoning

Let us begin with the delivery mechanisms of our substances from the Cold War. There were two primary forms.

The first was up close and personal. In order to accomplish this, they hired stage magician John Mulholland under MKULTRA subprojects 4, 15 and 34.

See “Prick” for further background on that coming out of the Canadian McGill University lawsuit against the US and Canadian governments for human experimentation research.

The second we learned of from the Church/Tower hearings regarding the “M-1” device which attached to normal weapons and could fire micro-organisms or substances at targets in two ways, one of which would leave the target unaware that he or she had been fired upon at all. “Prick II.”

But what are we to put into our needle delivery devices? There’s the possibility of the over 140 drugs tested on human subjects under MKULTRA, ARTICHOKE, BLUEBIRD, etc. {though many of those were tested for interrogation and brainwashing purposes}:



And then there was MKOFTEN, with a few references to it in the Family Jewels:



You’ll note database references to both drug side-effects, in this case pharmaceuticals, as well psychological effects. CIA was compiling a playbook whereby evoking particular effects would be possible for a number of purposes.

But all or most of that has become irrelevant. Again, the 1999 FOIA document from the US Army on bio-effects of microwaves:

There is, however, a growing perception that microwave irradiation and exposure to low frequency fields can be involved in a wide range of biological interactions. Some investigators are even beginning to describe similarities between microwave irradiation and drugs regarding their effects on biological systems.

And you have your “drug” and your delivery system all rolled up into one. Various “modalities” can be used for a wide range of effects, some of which I documented here under the microwave section, and more recently here and especially here complete with a few examples of how it could have been used. Depression, anger, sleepiness, sleeplessness, confusion, and a lot more, including causing real disease by affecting the blood-brain barrier, can be invoked in a human being using a microwave weapon.

Since it is also nearly or completely untraceable it likewise becomes very, very attractive to the would-be assassin or psyop operative seeking to create a false consensus about a particular individual or group by embarrassing them publicly. Unchecked, this technology which the government has certainly shown ample interest in, is a threat to freedom, to a healthy republic, and human health in general.

And yet we cannot talk about it openly because of the implicit connection to “tinfoil hat.” We assume that there would be checks and balances, despite ample evidence that there are little or no checks and that things are incredibly unbalanced. We forget that any time the CIA commits a crime and it involves state secrets, the Department of Justice has a longstanding agreement not to prosecute.

[CIA General Counsel Lawrence] Houston stressed that deliberate exposure of the MK/ULTRA program by essentially offering it to the press would serve to placate the brewing feeding frenzy over so-called mind control projects, and would divert any investigative attempts into the multi-faceted Artichoke Project.

Houston additionally explained to Rumsfeld and Cheney that, along with the release of MK/ULTRA details to the media, the names of a few former CIA employees, such as Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, would also be released to the press. Incredibly, when the subject of possible federal prosecutions of CIA officials for capital crimes and felonies, such as murder and drug trafficking, came up in their discussion, Houston informed Rumsfeld and Cheney that there was little cause for concern.

Explained the Agency’s General Counsel, since early 1954, following the death of Army biochemist Frank Olson, a secret agreement between the CIA and the U.S. Department of Justice had been put in place whereby the violation of “criminal statutes” by CIA personnel would not result in Department of Justice prosecutions, if “highly classified and complex covert operations” were threatened with exposure. The agreement had been struck between Houston and Deputy Attorney General William P. Rogers in February 1954, not long after Frank Olson’s death, and still remained solidly in place.

Jeffrey Kaye and HP Albarelli Jr., “Cries From the Past: Torture’s Ugly Echoes,” Truthout, 23 May 2010:


A reminder about what happened to Frank Olson. He witnessed MI6 testing deadly nerve toxins on UK soldiers and sought counseling with a CIA psychiatrist. Once the psychiatrist notified Gottlieb that one of his own had grown a conscience, Gottlieb arranged a secret meeting at which half the people were supposedly drugged with LSD, Olson included. It was later discovered that Olson may have been given something else, which resulted in a psychological breakdown. Once in NYC for further counseling, CIA had George Hunter White and “Pierre Lafitte” throw Olson out a window and sold the whole thing as a suicide.

And so it all festers, grows, leading us to the disturbing stasi-state of perpetual lies and warfare that we have today. How do we break out of this cycle? Someone has to step up.

As a bonus, you’ll note ‘drug trafficking’ bolded in the quote above along with murder, eg assassination. DEA, like FBI, is in the DoJ. Are poor white Southerners the next ‘market’ for Deep State’s drug running?

Holly Fletcher, “Overdose deaths reach ‘epidemic proportions’,” Tennessean, 28 September 2015:


And opioids are made from what?

AFP/Business Insider, “A record Afghan opium output has increased the supply of cheap heroin in the US,” 26 June 2015:


Whether it’s prescription or ‘horse,’ Afghanistan is the gift that keeps on giving to the criminal elite.

OPiuM for Political Hacks

Today, John McCain was going batty over China and “cyber.” This is not so much any sign of sincerity, but rather a variant on the old politician trick made famous by Nazis {but only because they used it to perform genocide} and neoconservatives because Michael Ledeen codified it in neocon writings.

The basic idea is to ascribe to your opponents your own worst attributes. Nazis accused Jews of killing children. Neocons accuse everyone else of voter fraud. It’s to get out ahead of any revelations as to the truth of their own involvement in the same. To a weak mind, subsequent reports of those having made those statements actually being the ones doing it may sound like tit-for-tat.

So it likely is with the Office of Personnel Management hack. The amount they scream about China is directly proportional to the amount of time they spend in bed with it.

As noted somewhere in the long tweet thread from the previous post and noted in the post before that, the GOP created their own CIA which was in part the actual CIA. They have the same capabilities and since CIA officers can freely moonlight on Wall Street in their free time what they are up to during that time is anyone’s guess.

But how to make the OPM Hack possible? They had to leave a backdoor, which is what the intelligence community keeps asking for more of. Just as making the American people as ignorant–and therefore pliable–as possible, one must first gut education funding, they prevented funding from going to protecting the identities and personal data of most covert employees of the US government. Blackmail and extortion–that is, threatening someone’s family–are all quite possible once you have this data.

Congress was warned about the possible problem, failed to provide funding to fix it. Here:

IT News AU, “OPM Chief blames hack on decades of infosec underinvestment,” 18 June 2015:


And does anyone really believe that we are at ‘war’ with China? It’s effing preposterous. This is George W. Bush’s “favored status” nation. Crooks always need a boogeyman in order to distract you when they pick your pocket.

The point of the op was several-fold. First, you have the very private dirt on new FBI agents just out of the academy. Should they ever get the silly idea of actually doing their jobs–already apparently soundly beaten out of the older, existing variety–you can threaten or blackmail them into not doing that. Second, you can recruit more agents into your GOP-CIA and DNC-CIA shadow organizations in order to further subvert the law and the American people while shoveling as much NATSEC money into your own pockets as possible.

And China will play the fall-guy for you. Why not? It’s not as though we haven’t been hacking the hell out of them too.

Of course none of this will see the light of day for decades. Instead we have Obama making absurd statements like the one about deeds following words. Does he get the irony? I think he does, I just don’t know how he reconciles his ability to sometimes eloquently state the right thing to do and then do the opposite, knowing that the effects will be catastrophic down the road, playing ye ol’ kick the can, the game that is becoming ever more dangerous to play.

GOP will share, or have already shared, the data with the Democrat spymasters as well, you can be sure. This is part of keeping it quiet, sharing the loot with the other crime family. They will then divvy up the people they find a use for like a football draft. The battle between two shit-eating species of vulture will pick over the bones of their kills, whether that be the middle class, the country or the planet. There will be no suitable-for-the-masses solution to climate change so long as CIA exists and these two parties are dominant.

This was, despite our friendly standing with China, treason. But it’s not treated like treason when you have the right friends and already keep the Department of Justice’s tiny, shriveled gonads in your freezer.

Now, we are only hearing that we need more cyber-police {the old Michael Hayden call for ‘digital Blackwater’}, because politicians are in reality more concerned about what you know, what you think, than protecting a single goddam thing. By not protecting things, they get more kickbacks. It really is that simple.

They won’t use any additional powers that we hand them to fix what’s broke, but rather figure out how to screw the American people further. It’s just what they do.

Guess what kind of people are not in the OPM database.

Central Intelligence Agency: The Para-Doxxing

A long string of tweets beginning with the link below presenting a tapestry of behavior that explains many, many things, beginning with why people fight amongst themselves, never seem to get the government that they want.


Several guest stars, including some newspapers who print the words of people who have consistently gotten things wrong, politicians who cannot make words and deeds meet, and even a popular pontiff and so much more. Observe as reality shows that the public interest is consistently violated by an Agency out of control.

You’re welcome.


Covert Battlefield America

“This empire of dirt.” — The Man in Black

Things to keep in mind as you read:

Your own built-in, hardwired optimism that the following cannot possibly be true;

Or, if it were, someone would be doing something about it;

This is not the only example, not by a longshot;

Our own breed of radical that really believes some of the crazy stuff they promote.

Right. Love science shows. At least when they aren’t fluff pieces for some industry or other, aren’t whitewashing things like human experimentation or the cynical motives of those who did them. And especially when they bring up stuff I hadn’t considered or hadn’t heard of before.

Such is Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman. Let’s take a look at some of the topics briefly:

S1E1 – “Is There a Creator?”

S1E4 – “What Happened Before the Beginning?”

S2E1 – “Is There Life After Death?”

S3E10 – “Did We Invent God?”

S4E1 – “Is There a God Particle?”

S4E2 – “Where Does Life Begin?”

S4E10 – “Did God Create Evolution?”

S5E1 – “Is God an Alien Invention?”

S5E8 – “Will We Become God?”

That’s just a smattering. Many of the other actual episodes include concepts, ideas, theories similar to these even if the main topic is not directly related to them.

Now I need to back up a bit and make an abrupt turn in order to provide some context.


See especially item 1 here, but also many subprojects connected to mental illness and effects that substances have on it here.


Summer 1980: Republicans create “GOP CIA” in order to conduct covert operations domestically for political purposes. History Commons. The line between the Agency and GOP becomes blurred and Director Casey is apparently aware of operations being conducted of behalf of both.

Writing in 2007, Kolb will reflect on the Republican Party’s “own in-house team of covert operatives, as capable of conducting espionage and sabotage for the Republican Party as for the CIA.”

You can safely assume that the Democrats have since done likewise.


18 September 2001: The Anthrax attacks occur. Pressure is placed on FBI to blame Iraq or Al Qaeda.

8 December 2001: Authority on DNA sequencing, Dr. Robert Schwartz, was murdered by his daughter and two other “pagan” teens with a sword.

AP, “Daughter Guilty in Dad’s Sword Killing,” 16 October 2002:


Patrick House, a former boyfriend, testified Oct. 8 that he and Schwartz were the primary characters in an elaborate role-playing game she invented called Underworld. Clara played the overlord, Lord Chaos, and House acted as an assassin assigned to kill “Old Guy” — Clara Schwartz’s father.

Let us recall the investigator’s desire to establish where the anthrax came from genetically. {Reminder: the perpetrator turned out to be an American, a Fort Detrick Army/CIA WMD expert named Bruce Ivins.}

Now on to what is obvious to me.

Mark Woods, “Morgan Freeman tragedy: Exorcism link to ‘senseless’ death of star’s granddaughter,” Christian Today, 17 August 2015:


The perpetrator, identified by the New York Post as an ex-boyfriend, screamed “Get out, devils! I cast you out, devils! In the name of Jesus Christ, I cast you out!” as he stabbed E’Dena Hines, 33, whose grandmother was Freeman’s first wife.

While no further details have been released, the immediate assumption is that Lamar Davenport – who is known to have abused alcohol and drugs – is mentally ill.

Foxnews, “Morgan Freeman’s step-granddaughter reportedly stabbed to death in ‘exorcism’,” 17 August 2015:


… A police source told the Post that the suspect “was still making a stabbing motion with his arm, but he had nothing in his fist — the knife was jutting out of her chest.”

Davenport was described by law enforcement sources as an aspiring rapper who performed under the name Lyric. He is the father of two young children — neither with Hines — and has a history of abusing drugs and alcohol.





I could, I suppose link to dozens or hundreds of far rightwing politicians calling for death camps, executions, making crazy cult-like statements, bashing science, bashing atheists, etc. I hope there is no need to do that. They would do it, some of them, and FBI would stay out it not prosecute because some of these same people control their budget, not to mention the 1950s agreement with DOJ not to prosecute CIA if sensitive methods/sources are used.

It’s all there. We don’t want to believe it because it’s easier to dismiss it or think it actually is some supreme being’s doing. It isn’t, it’s just arrogant, un-American assholes.

The Potential Emptiness of Half Full

Neuroscientist Dr. Tali Sharot has been working on a theory she calls “Optimism Bias.” Some of her research centered around asking people questions, getting them to assign a percentage to various positive and negative outcomes, and then measuring the actual percentages.

Guess what? We tend to underestimate negative possibilities and overestimate positive ones. When you think about human evolution this makes sense. After all, fitness advantages likely went to those who thought a particular new day would be better than the one before. Negative Nancy has the disadvantage of not believing she is capable of things that Positive Patty is. While Positive Patty might overestimate, for example, her ability to outrun a predator, her belief that she could pushed her abilities to the max, while Nancy starved hiding in a cave because she “knew” she couldn’t, it was just too dangerous out there.

And so this bias became hardwired in us. People overestimate, for example, their place in the economic strata. Lower-lower class think that they are middle- or upper-lower class, and so on right up to the upper class. And that was before the GOP succeeded in convincing trailer dwellers that they and people like Donald Trump have something in common, that they are just alike. It can only have gotten worse since then.

This built-in delusion mechanism, however, has served us well. “Can-do” has long been a human trait in all kinds of inspirational media. It has undoubtedly lead to humanity becoming the dominant species on the planet every bit as much as intelligence itself.

It is, of course, also what could very likely spell our doom. After all, positiveness without data, while it allows us to go on with our daily lives without worrying constantly about this or that, also leads to inaction when there perhaps should be action.

Take climate change, for example. We believe deniers {now to be called doubters by the Associated Press, who has adjusted its style book because deniers complained that it made them sound like Holocaust deniers} want to believe someone when they are told that climate change, global warming is a hoax. That is actually being optimistic.

Then the rest of us, having our brains filled with candy via television of those hardworking spies and police whose only thought is how to protect them and their children from the big bad Muslims, means that the government must be altruistic. Someone must be doing something about climate change, they’re just keeping it secret from us, is what they think. But ‘Superman’ frequently looks more like Machiavelli when you pay attention without bias.

This is the problem. Even those of us who know something is rotten {mass surveillance, pro-business/anti-public legislation/legal rulings, etc.} do not yet grep just how bad it is. We don’t want to focus on that, of course, because it can be demoralizing, debilitating. “If it is as bad as Chris suggests, what can be done about it?”

Knowledge is the first step. Acceptance is the second. Calming down is the third. Then, deciding how to proceed is the fourth. We can be positive, but we have to understand the underpinnings of a problem before we can actually fix anything.

For example, I don’t think you can get money out of politics without also dealing with the lack of a barrier between the private sector and the intelligence community. They each protect the other, but this is not obvious. We are still talking as though, for example, electing Elizabeth Warren would fix all our problems. Brief diversion here regarding her interview on Colbert last night, but $10 billion is not a lot of money to recover compared with how much they have stolen and continue to steal. It’s not even a traffic ticket, more like loose change. End diversion.

Finally, because I like a plot twist, this is not the post I actually wanted you to read. This is just the post preparing you for the next one.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 129 other followers