Whistleblower Carl Clark

Thanks to FFCHS for sending out the link to a English translation (PDF) {link updated 20150127} of this German article (PDF) – “Secret Surveillance and Electromagnetic Torture by the Secret Services.”

It’s a bit over-the-top in places, and yet much of what he describes (note the article is from April 2004 and I only just saw the thing a few days ago) matches my experience and my interpretation of the possible explanations for the experiences of others.

I am still hesitant to go the Freemason conspiracy route. I’ve known many over the years and they certainly did not seem the sort to do these kinds of things, were often people who adored the founding fathers (some of whom were also masons), and the nature of NKINTRA seems so counter to that that I cannot imagine that the mason status of some involved is merely coincidental. Painting any group with a broad brush is foolish. (That said, when your enemies are cowardly, it’s difficult to get specific with the names, hence having to resort to the names of organizations, the employees of many are well-meaning and hard-working. All the more reason they should be desirous to eject the criminals in their midst).

Additionally, I don’t know what to make of the DNA collection thing. As I wrote before, that strange loss of an oval of skin on my leg I tend to think was for framing purposes, that is they intended to place my DNA at a crime scene, arrest me, and then institutionalize me after being interviewed about my experiences, a clean way of silencing a witness in a way even his former friends, having already seen him drugged and behaving strangely, would not be able to much question. (See again item 1 from the 1955 MK/Ultra draft memorandum that escaped the destroy order).

In both cases, I lean toward “Carl Clark” (which I assume to be a pseudonym) as being given some disinfo. Compartmentalization and need-to-know at work again. He was a field op, no reason he should know the motives beyond inference based on what was done and to whom.

Despite those misgivings, the harassment he describes follows along really well.

Carl Clark: … I would join certain groups, make friends with some of the members and then proceed to ruin their lives.

Carl Clark: I spied on people for long periods, eavesdropped on their conversations. I also had orders to confuse or deceive them. I would therefore secretly force my way into their homes, remove some things and just move others around.* I would then delete data from their computer. Or I would just drive them crazy, by following them and turning up close by either in the railway station or the bus station, etc. Otherwise, I would stage a fight in the street right in full view of the target’s eyes, and many other ploys. If our orders were to put somebody under more pressure or even arrest them, I would install certain material on their computers such as child pornography , instructions to manufacture a bomb, etc.

What happened to me:

Early 2008

Three or four things occurred as I began writing The Wisp. I’m not entirely sure of the order (I have it noted somewhere), but that probably doesn’t matter. Note that I tried to rationalize these events away. In context of the more recent, it’s clear they were connected.

I received an email from a phony address in Brazil stating that I was being watched and that the sender would be in touch again at some point later. They never were as far as I know.
The lock to my apartment suddenly began sticking when I put the key in. I could feel the difference in the ease of use between the previous use and the one where it started giving us trouble. We had to have a locksmith replace it a day or two later. I believe this was either a ham-handed lockpick job or a good one designed to make me think it was a ham-handed one; an intimidation attempt.

On the way to a friend’s house the driver of a black pickup truck with tinted windows pretended to want to run me over. I have been over and over the facts at that intersection. In order to even get close to me, this driver had to switch lanes quickly in front of a City bus and come almost as close to hitting a parked van next to me as it did me. No way it was “just one of those things.”

Early 2010:

Could not find a bag I had been taking back and forth to work inside which was my writing notebook. It reappeared after three days, further convincing my ex that I was losing my mind (even though we had recently watched Gaslight. I guess I was supposed to blame him for it. Damn, but they must have had an awful psych profile for me).

Armin Gross: What type of individuals were you instructed to target?

Carl Clark: People who were politically relevant. Likewise, people who opposed or acted against the interests of large companies such as the pharmaceuticals. Some belonged to criminal gangs, but there were two or three targets that had nothing on them at all as far as I could make out.

Armin Gross: How many individuals did you have under surveillance in total?

Carl Clark: In the 80s it was five or six, in the 90s seven, and from 2000 to 2003, there were three. You can appreciate from the low number of targets how intensive the targeting was. One requires at least six months right at the outset to accumulate as much information as possible about prospective targets’ past lives.

Armin Gross: How did you acquire this information?

Carl Clark: From the garbage can, the telephone, mail, the Internet. That sort of thing has got much easier with recent advances in technology. ** Bugs are no longer necessary as you can eavesdrop on mobile phones, ISDN phones or small parabolic receiving dishes nowadays. Unfortunately, the deployment of microwave weapons has, in addition, become very practicable.

** Not to mention NSA’s massive surveillance program.


Armin Gross: Did you also use such weapons?

Carl Clark: No. I was responsible for surveillance. Colleagues from special departments did this. However, I was at times on site when these weapons were deployed.

Armin Gross: Can you describe in more detail how the deployment of weapons took place?

Carl Clark: It’s a bit like what takes place in a science fiction movie. People can be tracked anywhere by radar, satellite, a base station and complimentary computer programs. For example, three radar devices would sometimes be positioned in the vicinity of the target. The radar emits electromagnetic waves, some of which pick up the target and the result is then evaluated. My friends who work in the special department could then follow the target all day on their computers. This form of localising the target made it easy to deploy the weapons accurately. My colleagues could see exactly where to aim and also observe how the target reacted.

Some of what is in that fictional chapter happened. I, of course, had to alter the circumstances for Eli Schneider and I had better sense than to venture into Central Park at night while being harassed. The man Schneider recognized was in real life co-owner of two or three gay bars in the Village and also an alumni of West Point I would later learn. He did show up all gansta in his coat one evening.

Instead of seeing Maya, I saw a guy who resembled the other guy from the deli. His name, he said, was Ludo. My next venture there or so, I met another named Chris. Ludo-Chris or ludicrous. They made sure I “got” the joke via voice-to-skull. There was also that disturbing truck that smelled of dead meat and had blood dripping out of it. Imagine that while under the effects of a drug or otherwise altered brain chemistry that heightens your awareness. This was the road to insanity for a time.

Armin Gross: What effect did the weapons have on the targets?

Carl Clark: They create heat, inner burns, pain, nausea, fear. Sometimes traces are left on the skin, but mostly not. If the targets go to the doctor, they get told everything is OK. Take into account, this was the situation ten years ago. This technology has advanced considerably since then.

See again also item 5 from the same memo, mimicking known diseases.

And, yeah, there have been advances. It’s behavioral modification (I hate the ‘mind control’ label because it sounds so exacting, but it darn close).

Armin Gross: What is the objective of such attacks?

Carl Clark: The aim is to intimidate certain people, for example people who make a lot of noise. I myself was under attack for three years after opting out. I’m virtually sure that weapons were used against me in 2003/2004 which provoked strong aggression. I almost killed somebody on two occasions, once a neighbour who was a pleasant elderly lady.

I really knew I was losing my s*** in Minneapolis in 2010 (might have been 2011) when I cursed out an old fella with a cane. Definitely a tough old bird, former military.

I was enjoying some music and euphoria (see item 11) but was still conscious enough of my surroundings to move to the grass giving the man a wide berth. He “ruined” my good vibes by stopping and shouting, “Argh!” and waving his cane.

I immediately became incredibly angry. When I inquired as to why he had done that, he said “Get out of my way!”

There was a lot of cursing after that. He stopped making eye contact and moved on. I was told that he would on occasion halt in front of my apartment building and shake his cane angrily.

By the way, he had a button that read, “Hey, Cheney, go f*** yourself.” Also one with “I [Heart] Boobs”. I think we would have gotten along fine under other circumstances, especially since he can have the boobs.

This was similar to the event in the Minneapolis grocery store with the cop playing with his holstered sidearm and shouting, “What?!?” at me over and over. An attempt to provoke violence. It’s what these people do.


Armin Gross: Do you think it’s possible to directly influence feelings by weaponising electromagnetic rays?

Carl Clark: Without doubt. We know that living organism is sensitive to electromagnetic radiation. Elementary life processes within cells function by biogenic electromagnetic oscillation. Frequencies from the exterior can damage or change these processes. There have already been far-reaching attempts at influencing body, mind and soul through frequencies within the framework of military research. It’s possible to provoke fear, aggression, nervousness or forgetfulness in this way. In combination with other interventions, a target can be driven insane. For example, radiofrequency can be manipulated so that the target hears his own name on the radio or his computer shows his name time and again. Voices are also specifically transmitted to a target commenting on his activities. For example, I heard a voice in the morning after getting up which said “ Get up and injure somebody”.


Armin Gross: People are actually being driven to psychic extremes then?

Carl Clark: Yes, the undoubted goal is to have select people end up in psychiatric institutions. If a target seeks help by going to the police or to the doctor, they don’t get taken seriously. Some doctors and hospitals actually work together with the Secret Services. Diagnostic directives permit a patient who feels persecuted or hears voices to be classified as schizophrenic.

(Hi, Lynnae. Hang in there, baby.)

And let us not forget Ewan Cameron and (most likely) E. Fuller Torrey.

Armin Gross: Hospitals cooperate with the Secret Services?

Carl Clark: Yes, certainly. Large companies too. That’s why one lives dangerously if one carries out investigations on large companies. The American State protects large companies like MacDonald’s, Coca-Cola and certain pharmaceutical enterprises. These companies also have FBI agents at their disposal for matters related to industrial espionage.

Hi, Balding, you f***er.


Armin Gross: Do you know in which countries individuals are under surveillance and are being assaulted by energy weapons?

Carl Clark: The USA, Germany, China, North Korea, Russia, France and England, normally without the official knowledge of the particular government. But unofficially, I believe that government personnel must be involved in some way or know something about the goings-on.

Of course they do. Joe Lieberman and Peter L. King must top that list.


Armin Gross: Why did you opt out?

Carl Clark: I saw that what I was doing was wrong. The last two targets that were allocated to me had done nothing. They were not political, quite normal, nice people, not criminal or economically dangerous.

Armin Gross: You’ve already mentioned that opting out in 2003 caused you problems. Can you give a few examples?

Carl Clark: I was once followed by a helicopter through the night as I drove a truck 3,000 miles to deliver packages. As I walked along an alley, I was attacked by a man who struck me a blow. Then on another occasion, somebody removed three connections from my engine on the motorway causing the engine to get dislodged and fall out of its casing. On another occasion as I drove a truck with a three-ton load, two of my tires suddenly exploded. When the police arrived, they stated they’d never witnessed anything like it. Then there was the time when I was followed over a great distance whilst driving. It made me so angry that I brought my car to an abrupt halt, grabbed my baseball bat and got out of the car. Three cars which were tailing me suddenly took off in reverse gear at great speed. In normal circumstances, they would have reported my behaviour to the police, but these did not. On another occasion, I was sent three people who were supposed to strike up a friendship with me in order to spy on me. As I knew they were listening in on my telephone conversations, I stated loudly on the telephone to somebody that I planned to kill the people who had wormed their way into my life. The three individuals disappeared from the scene altogether after that.

I’m not sure that would work for everyone. I do suggest recording their conversations and taking their photos (the former only if it is legal in your state). Then make backups, keep them in multiple places, and keep at least one or two copies on your person at all times.

Armin Gross: And what’s the current situation? Do you think you are still being targeted?

Carl Clark: Of course. I have also found out that the secret services wish to know why I flew to Germany.

Armin Gross: Are you not then living dangerously at present?

Carl Clark: I am prepared to stand up to them. They also know that I know a lot about them, and that I intend to do something about their violations or breaches. I have friends in special units, people in Afghanistan and in Iraq that support me.

Tips for Victims of Surveillance.

Armin Gross: Have you any tips for people who feel they are under surveillance?

Carl Clark: It’s a good idea to avoid the use of certain terminology in emails such as “government” or “mind control”, etc., because digital surveillance seeks out key, sought-after vocabulary. It’s also an idea to check out whether anyone’s forced their way into your home. Intruders often deploy anaesthetic gases sprayed through the letter box on a door for example
before they break in during the night. You’d just wake up in the morning with a metallic taste in your mouth. If cars behave in a strange way, you should take note of the registration numbers. If you receive letters you don’t recognise or expect, they should be wrapped in aluminium foil. There are special measuring devices to detect high frequency rays in the home.

Armin Gross: Do you know of any other whistleblowers who have related stories similar to yours?

Carl Clark: Up to now, no. But I hope that there will be more who are prepared to go public in the future.

I obviously disagree with not using those words, and in fact I suggest using them and worse all the time. Gunk up the works until these a-holes shape up and stop creating homegrown terrorism for profit.

(Fun additional note: numerous phone calls while typing this up and while posting links at FB and Twitter, a knock at the door brought two sweet Watchtower ladies. I tell ya, this is topnotch tax-payer funded entertainment for me. Any spooks out there with the ability and not in the harassment end of things can check the “interesting” pattern of posts with the damn phone ringing over the past week several days {time flies…}. There is a wonderful correlation with only, I think, one exception. You may have to include the cellphones to see it).


“Two riders were approaching…”


1 Comment

Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s