Anatomy of a Totalitarian State

First, as order of business, the flat tire:


Next, too many to pick just one, see the articles under National Newsworthy. Much to do with silencing whistleblowers.

There can, ultimately, be no other motive for all of this than population reduction. The world’s elite, deciding they like things the way they’ve been for the past hundred years or so, don’t want to have to deal with solving problems like having to feed masses who might come to demand food and succeed in their request given vast superior numbers. World’s population doubles every ten years. Tell me what is being done to deal with it if my analysis is wrong.

Though I certainly do think that seizing arable, hunting, farming, and fishing land is on the menu. Guaranteed, when they really let fly that native reservations will be invaded. Most likely false-flagged justifications, if those will even be required at that point. But that will be in addition to thinning the herd, not in place of it. Same with aforeblogged African terror groups undoubtedly run by NATO.

Speaking of which, yes, I’m now willing to jump over to the conclusion that Wikileaks and Anonymous are also. (See the FireDogLake sequester post at the link). The only reason for their existence is to crack down on the Internet. No other reason for it (apart from trying to paint gay military members as traitorous as a group in order to put that group on the list of those to be placed in unlawful military prisons like Japanese during WWII… Or is that gays, Jews, gypsies, etc.?).

It’s all puppet theater. Like GLADIO A and B, C is about controlling legislation, public opinion, and most importantly the overall narrative.

I’ve been meaning to discuss more specifics about the mind games, the PSYOPS, how they work, etc. but interruptions, interruptions. It boils down to, as Kurzweil pointed out in his recent book, that we humans are good at pattern matching because that’s what we developed an ability to do. Part game is to present phony patterns in order to lead one to false conclusions.

It’s not that that has not happened to me, it clearly at times has. But if one what was said in one V2K session is true, it seems I’m better at separating the phony patterns from the real ones.

We, in part, on the higher levels, think in abstractions. We apply one situation to another. So, they try to point you to false narratives as explanation. The key, I think, is running it past as many of the facts as you can and see if it stands up. This was one of the problems early on, that I could not find an explanation, a “string theory” that made sense of everything that happened (even then recognizing that some of it occurred specifically in order to confuse, obfuscate).

GLADIO helps to explain it. Certainly there are people who are sincere in the federal government, who have bought the same deluge of lies the rest of us have.

Call it what you want. Mind control. Behavioral modification or structuring. It works. I don’t want to overstate how well but don’t want to understate it either. As long as they can convince you that your proposed actions make sense, have a sound reason for doing it (recognizing that some of the conditioning and drugging is done for the purpose of expanding those range of acceptable actions), they can get you to do it without ever realizing there was any outside interference at all. That’s the bottom line.

As long as this remains untouched (and with the war on whistleblowers, it likely will), there’s a dark future ahead.

A mini devil’s advocate discussion begins with asking, what are the alternatives? There are several problems with that. First, the actions taken (apart from the eventual reduction in demand via having people kill each other en masse) actually exacerbate the problem. Military action accelerates climate change, increases debt, sucks away funding for constructive research. Second, if these people actually believed the philosophies of their faiths, then they would also believe that they would need to try.

I’ll give a local example. It’s just a rumor, but find another way to explain it.

Michigan’s last Winter was the wettest in recorded history. More accumulation than any year known.

And yet the water levels are among the lowest recorded. NOAA man even told me, he had been up-river measuring.

How is that possible? The rumor is that there are tankers sucking up the water and shipping it to China in order to pay down a small portion of the debt we owe them. A small portion…a lot of water if it lowers the measured depth.

So, military action (and the bloated security infrastructure) is also forcing us to give over our water supply.

And then there’s the increasing of hostilities by killing of innocent bystanders causing us to spend more to counter it. Terrorism has increased since 2001, not decreased. We are actually less safe even without the war on US citizens.

None of the arguments, apart from having the gun held to our collective heads, make sense, hold up to scrutiny, but always seem to enrich and empower the defense industry and some top brass. This leads to the question as to whether the decision was actually fact-based at all.

That is all.


Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s