Race War

With racial tensions increasing in various places in the US and knowing how opportunists seize such events for their own glory and popularity, it seems appropriate to present some historical background regarding what some of the other root causes are, that is besides slavery and post-WWII racism in the VA and HUD resulting in handouts for white veterans and whites in general only, etc. Is there the potential that some of what we are seeing is distraction, exaggeration, narrative control, propaganda for political and/or financial gain, etc.? History would seem to shout, “Yes!”

{As is customary, I will also take a sharp turn at the end in order to show how each time you take a step back from a situation, you can see a larger one that encompasses it. “Damned if you do, damned if you don’t” would seem to the lesson.}

The most recent events pit police against African-Americans, with Facebook and Twitter armies passionately jumping into the fray of words. This is emotional contagion, which the Department of Defense, with at least one connection to the CIA via a son of a man already connected to it, tested on Facebook, Twitter, and other social networks over the past year or two. Our indicators–news and the comments of those we interact with–become what shape our perception. Control the indicators and control perception. Control perception and you control reality, at least to the extent that belief and emotional attachment to beliefs control the reality.

If one follows what has happened with public opinion regarding Muslims in the United States and can actually understand the least little bit about math…


…can see that some things are grossly exaggerated. You can add ISIL and still not come close to the 1% mark.

Who would want to label people of color the same way? First and foremost, these same political opportunists whose continuing criminal activities require people to be focused on some other threat, to manipulate the sheep that they regularly sheer of wealth and property to be so afraid of someone or something else that they sort of look the other way while they are being robbed.

Perhaps, then, the better question is, who could label a group of people in this way? Who has the body of knowledge, the experience, the interest, and the utter lack of ethics to do so? What are some of the other historical items that we can point to?


Of course, there is at least one MKULTRA subproject related to race. Subproject #123. From the Freedom of Information Act info itself:

F-1976-00374 0RIPPUB U

However, you won’t find any of the known subprojects as being related to police–apart from some tenuous attempts to understand the mindset of security services in Eastern Europe. Not exactly what we are looking for.

However, if one looks at the CIA Family Jewels, one does come across an operation known as MERRIMAC. From the Director of Security’s cover letter:


He is referring to militarizing police. As is common when there is criminality being committed by an agency such as CIA, there is no mention of the root cause, merely a denial that it was illegal to do so. Why was CIA arming local police? Because their security personnel weren’t trained to deal with attacks and riots.

What it does not answer is why CIA should be concerned with violence and riots. The list of possible answers is so long that I would certainly miss some. Human experimentation would be top of my list, but running drugs into the US in order to fund other operations–and by the way fleece the poor in Los Angeles and make their situation worse via the very, very addictive crack cocaine–might be at top for others. ** Death squads might also rank high, as would spying on American citizens. And then there’s the similarity between militarizing local police for fear of attack by land and ‘Buzzy’ Krongard’s concern over the fire protection system at CIA HQ in Langley just months prior to 9/11. *


One weekend in, I think, Spring of 2011, I took a walk in Downtown. There weren’t many people about, so I assume this was a Sunday with most shops closed. As I passed an entrance to an interior mall, I saw several men–police and/or mall security–surrounding a young African-American male who was on the ground. This being during the heavily drugged phase of my ‘Black Boot Diaries’ experiences, I can’t be certain if I imagined them kicking him or if what I saw appeared to be just after such activity. What I do know, it was extremely creepy and disturbing, or would have been had I not been in that strange drugged state.

It might have been through these doors:


Let me pause before continuing and take a guess as to why they would–prior to engaging in this kind of thing on a larger scale–would share some early test with me. There has historically been one directive where methods {and sources} are concerned when it comes to CIA: Protect them. Along comes the Open Government Directive and suddenly CIA is faced with a dilemma. How do you on the one hand protect advances in manipulating human beings and on the other comply with being open? You can’t have a leak, not really, because whichever employee leaks it is in violation of signed agreements to keep secrets. Additionally, you don’t actually want people to believe it when you let it out. How do you solve that problem? You use an unwitting asset, turn him into a ‘conspiracy theorist,’ drug the hell out of him, harass him to the point of madness. You reveal the truth but make sure it’s not actually believed. Both directives are complied with.

Back to the story. As I walked a bit further, perhaps to the right of where the pedestrian can be seen in the street…


…I encountered another young African-American male who was cursing pretty much uncontrollably. I asked if there was anything I could do and he was entirely unable to verbalize what exactly it was that he was angry about. Drugged does not mean incurious apparently.

Here, again I reiterate that the Army stated internally in 1998 that this it is possible to make someone angry utilizing a ‘modality’ of pulsed microwaves. Via FOIA:

There is, however, a growing perception that microwave irradiation and exposure to low frequency fields can be involved in a wide range of biological interactions. Some investigators are even beginning to describe similarities between microwave irradiation and drugs regarding their effects on biological systems. For example, some suggest that power density and specific absorption rate of microwave radiation may be thought of as analogous to the concentration of the injection solution and the dosage of drug administration, respectively. Clearly, the effects of microwaves on brain tissue, chemistry, and functions are complex and selective. Observations of body weight and behavior revealed that rats, exposed under certain conditions to microwaves, eat and drink less, have smaller body weight as a result of nonspecific stress mediated through the central nervous system and have decreased motor activity. It has been found that exposure of the animals to one modality of radiofrequency electromagnetic energy substantially decreases aggressive behavior during exposure. However, the opposite effects of microwaves, in increasing the mobility and aggression of animals, has also been shown for a different exposure modality.

US Army, “Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons,” 17 February 1998, declassified 6 December 2006:


This was not the only such event I encountered, though this one is not entirely the same. On another evening, I witnessed Minneapolis PD pushing a pair of young African-American females on horseback. That is, they were being ‘herded’ by horse, being driven towards the parking lot on the sidewalk left of center…


…while begging for the officer to stop it. Words like ‘please’ and ‘sir’ fell on deaf ears. I gathered that a male friend of theirs misbehaved, became involved in an altercation, at a club in Downtown and was arrested. The pair of women he was with were instead forced to leave as I’ve detailed.

To add insult to injury, when they arrived at the parking lot…


…the car belonging to one of the women had been broken into. Cars surrounding hers appeared to have been left alone.

Don’t know enough about what transpired in the club and really am not sure about the SOP regarding using horses in non-riotous situations, but the break-in certainly would make any normal person crazy right after the other events.


As I’ve stated many times, when they set their mind to it, the ‘game’ is played so that whichever way something falls out, it actually furthers the goals of the Deep State. I’ve called it 3-D chess.

In this case, what happens?

A} The return of open racism, pitting citizens against police while ignoring things like robbing of pension funds for government workers and imminent domain in poor neighborhoods. Taken to its logical end, the successful painting of African-Americans as they have largely done with Muslims. This will ensure further growth of the already private prison system in the country with the highest incarceration rate in the world.

B} A backlash against police resulting in the full or partial privatization of police. Only the wealthy and large companies will be able to afford justice. The rest of us will get to re-live the Old West or the Middle Ages ‘cept different. {See? You get your pick: Mob Lynching or the Plague.} This will ensure that the poor, because there won’t be a middle class when they’re done, are under the heel of corporate mercenaries. The bad cases we’ve seen recently will become commonplace enough that people will say when new ones are reported, “We know, this has been happening for decades,” as if that’s some sort of excuse.

But suppose, follow me for a moment, and agree for the sake of argument that the Central Intelligence Agency, directly or indirectly as employees and former employees work for special business interests, is behind it. Now what?


I’ll save you the trouble. He says CIA is out of control and dangerous. And he is not wrong.

But what is the fix?

Mark Ames, “Ron Paul Wants to Abolish the CIA; His Largest Donor Builds Toys for It: Why does 76 percent of the civil libertarian’s Super PAC money come from billionaire Peter Thiel, whose Palantir Technologies helps the government spy on citizens?” The Nation, 23 February 2012:


Privatization of the CIA? Exactly the same goal in driving a wedge between law enforcement and the poor. Put absolute power into the hands of billionaires. We are still deluded into thinking that a kind king is somehow better than democracy.

Government at least once had the attribute of being held somewhat accountable if the people knew what was happening, of checks and balances, and viewing very large, powerful lobbies as threats to liberty. Now they serve them.

The point? They’re just going to cut out the middle-man no matter how things fall out.

* One might wonder why I include these kinds of things. It’s to give some idea of what the true mindset it; a psychological profile. “Anything for a buck,” sums it up nicely but in my experience most Americans are unable to grasp what ‘anything’ truly means in that phrase.

** Actually, this occurred later, so not a reason at that point.


Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s