Assassination Reconsiderations

Does motive always mean culprit? When it’s among the poor, working class, and often even among the wealthy, we can usually safely assume so.

However, when the real purpose is something bigger, like creating a permanent rift between half the populace and the other half, one should tread carefully.

For example, Cheney’s alleged dark warning to Minnesota and Paul Wellstone just before the latter’s death in a plane crash and the collapse of a bridge, well how hard is it to imagine? Certainly the collision between New York Times reporter Judith Miller and Cheney is a matter of record. But is that the same?

I don’t think so. As I’ve noted elsewhere, probably on Twitter some months back, Cheney seemed a surprised, to the point he couldn’t stop laughing–I have resembled that remark from time to time for similar reasons–and was shaking his head in disbelief. Whatever else he may be, he had issues with the Langley Shit Dragon since the 1970s, possibly related to the Frank Olson case in some manner or other, and appears to be a “targeted individual” otherwise. I’m not suggesting sainthood here. I am suggesting maybe it’s easier to label household names as bad people than it is anonymous caterer spies. And that we like having people to blame.

So I’m suggesting that like the canceled news conference due to a fire, he didn’t order the hit on Wellstone either. Once again this sounds like CIA trying to spread as much doubt and blame elsewhere as it possibly can. Much like the Houston Plan, where CIA refused to spy on Americans when asked BECAUSE IT WAS ALREADY SPYING ON AMERICANS AND DIDN’T WANT TO ADMIT IT, so it can be with assassination that can make it seem as if all our problems stem from neoconservatism {and for that matter neoliberalism} when in fact there is very hard historical evidence that many more of our problems than people can accept originate from a department/agency that does not even require Congress anymore because it draws much of its funding from the illegal drug business.

Similarly, I must think that Michael Hastings, whose book and reporting resulted in the loss of jobs of some senior military officers due to insubordination, was likely them as well. While the officers might have been thankful it happened–they should be ashamed if so–they didn’t do it either.

This is just the Langley Shit Dragon playing at being Satan: It provides “luck” which feeds into your dark side. Is it any wonder Hollywood, Wall Street, and SilVal all seem to bask in scandal and employee abuse with a Velocipooper on the loose? And then they thank it by praising it in film, giving it moonlighting jobs, and handing over the data from civil rights activists so it can shovel some more of itself all over this now well-fertilized country of ours.

Aaron Swartz I’m still not 100% on for some reason. Could be FBI counterintelligence, though that’s really just an extension of CIA as well. See for example George Hunter White who freely bounced back and forth as well as to DEA precursors. Still this way for some, I imagine.


Gonna make this quick since if I don’t acknowledge the stupid-in-its-own-little-shitty-way it will harass me for the rest of the day until I do. This is yet another example of how the Langley Shit Dragon, which is the most evil organization on Earth bar none, which must die in order to save the species, which has no redeeming qualities whatsoever, tries to play its own little shitty version of whataboutism.

Further bonus, if I word this just right, I’ll piss off The Intercept as well. Because, you know, when you live in the lap of luxury, you can afford things like always standing on principles. It’s just part of white privilege.

The problem with shutting down CIA is, you’ll have all these psychos on the loose. What to do? There’s only one legitimate solution: Watch ’em, 24/7/365. Yes, I’m creating a loophole for NSA. Sorry, but if you aren’t willing to take a walk in my moccasins to see why that is, well, f*** you.

The silly part: This is all about Directv, which is now part of AT&T. System stopped working, of course I’m the one designated to deal with it. After over and hour on the phone {first wait time ending in a hang up by the tech}, the answer is either accept an estimated $99 service call or add a $8.99 per month service contract. So you got that? “We don’t guarantee that our equipment will work. We will charge you if it doesn’t.”

Right. AT&T.

Ryan Gallagher and Henrik Moltke, “The Wiretap Rooms: NSA’s Hidden Spy Hubs in Eight US Cities,” The Intercept, 25 June 2018:

No. Langley Shit Dragon always tries to get you to look elsewhere. Reminder, it started torture almost right out of the gate in the early 1950s when it established the Shah of Iran’s Savak. CIA has always been torture central.

Emma Lake, “Utterly Brutal Grisly truth of Iran’s torture prisons revealed in new museum recreating brutal techniques with dummies,” Sun UK, 4 December 2017:

And a child rape and slavery center. And a drug cartel. And murderers. And mad science experimenters. Really, how can anyone believe anymore that there is anything at Langley worth keeping?

Fearlessness and Finding the Truth

It can be argued, I suppose, that all philosophy is bullshit. After all, it isn’t immutable. We as a society accept and reject, sometimes we verbally accept and then by our actions reject, whatever the flavor of morality and/or ethics of the day are.

Sometimes we do so situationally. There are exceptions to the “rules” and so forth. Sometimes, a few of us do it in order to get one over on the bulk of the rest of us. If you don’t have to play by the rules that everyone else does, you can frequently find loopholes to exploit there.

The point there, though, is that lofty abstractions tend to be a human invention and therefore cannot be called laws of physics. But does that mean examining abstractions, truth for example, is not a worthy endeavor?

The question before the “monstrous panel” {a sort of menagerie of woodland creatures, old monster movie characters, and perhaps some ginger orphan: She keeps trying to join the club—they make decent filters and touchstones sometimes, so let’s see where this goes} is, “Does letting go of fear allow one to see the truth more clearly?”

I, or we, if you prefer, would have to say “yes.” Though it’s probably not a given that if you, in so far as you are humanly capable, no longer care if you live or die {the flesh, the meat, the lizard brain, etc. somewhere inside likely still does}, can you see things clearer?

I would view it as one step, not necessarily the panacea. Fear is part of it. Hate is another. If you’re completely entrenched in your political party dogma, for example, you might entirely miss just how similar on policy and results your party and their opponents are. This MAD TV sketch nailed it years ago; it’s about identity and language, not real world results being different.

We can’t see that because we’re so entrenched with our tribe and have demonized the opposing side to the point that we no longer even care if they have a valid point, no longer care what they think because, dammit, they’re just Evil.

So fear and hate are linked and color our perceptions. There’s a reason the whole Jedi thing struck a nerve with people. And a reason, one assumes, ye olde sheepherders rulebook talked about Faith. While it is not always true, perhaps due to alterable mores, frequently when people were stranded and starving, it was actually the people who did not eat other people who tended to survive while those who did eat the flesh of others, intuitively would seem opposite since we think nourishment is necessary for fitness and survival, who died. Clearly there’s some kind of placebo effect going on there. And it triumphed over protein absorption.

They believed in something. Not so sure it mattered what. But they obviously trusted something, and that somehow carried them through.

Recall the 2010 BoingBoing article about Buffalo I think. The dominant male bull will make the same sound and actions when he spots a predator as when he just wants the females to move closer. In other words, he “lies” and uses fear to get laid because those actions proved desirable in the past. “Hey, remember that time we swooped in and saved you all from the Nazis?” becomes a guilt-trippy device to get political goals achieved. “Hey, remember that time the Nazis nearly eliminated us?” becomes a means of murdering impoverished Muslims without international law being implemented.

And yet at the same time, the US did help defeat the Nazis. And the Nazis did try their damnedest to eliminate all Jews.

So it can all go wonky at any given moment. What might the third thing be, after letting go anger and fear?

Letting go of arrogance.

This is a toughy. We think we need anger to provide the energy necessary to “win.” We think we need self-confidence also. Probably we do.

But being able to tell the difference between self-confidence and hubris is no easy task. There, we must humble ourselves. Not necessarily before other people, but it helps to examine ideas, like, “Well, we are, all of us, sort of pirates. Some of us just take it further than others. Some use lies and deception, some use planes and bombs, some use a broken legal system, some use the Internet, some abuse the authority that the rest of us have given them along with secrecy because they assured us they needed that and asked us to trust them.”

Fear is what prevents us letting go of arrogance. We are afraid of losing ourselves, that it “feels” like giving up when you let go of that righteous anger.

I’m here to say I’m a far more effective warrior, whatever that means, since I’ve given up hatred as much as I can, fear {ditto; does it look like I’m trying to commit suicide by CIA assassination or does it look like I’m trying to end this BS to get to what matters to me most? Assess my actions on any given day and the answer might seem to differ}, and arrogance.

The funny part here is how so many powerful people, or really organizations, think this means obedience to them. Really. As if they are themselves gods. It is unbelievable how arrogant they can be. And they will fall as a result of that. Possibly already have but don’t realize it yet.

And yet I find some of the other most powerful people to be, somehow, I don’t entirely get it, humble as pie. Don’t know how they check themselves on that. Lots of practice maybe. Maybe deference to some holy figure or other. Or maybe it’s because they keep their eyes on the goal and don’t let fear cloud their judgment, again, as much as humanly possible.

I tell ya, it is surprising what you start to see when you try this. Safety in numbers of political party doesn’t mean a whole lot. Just means the same thing will be repeated over and over again years from now as you and the “opposition,” which agrees on 90+% of everything anyway, just digs those foxholes deeper and deeper.

The Langley Magicians

According to the manual written in part or whole by stage magician John Mulholland in the 1950s {see Subproject 4 for links to it; you can actually buy it now}, the basic ways to drug a person involve sleight-of-hand and dispensers disguised as ordinary objects. Coins, for example. The officer would squeeze it and a drop or two of whatever would fall into the target’s drink after diverting their attention. CIA officers did this or something similar to an American living in Paris, France.

Today it is no doubt quite different. The ability to get a human being to choose a particular gallon of milk or particular piece of meat from a buffet is now doable. Really. You wouldn’t even know there was any interference with your decision-making at all.

How whatever substance appeared in the food is another matter. Another shopper, not even necessarily an officer but an asset, could inject, spray, or spill whatever is required.

The Langley Shit Dragon sits back with its proxy army under control and does as it pleases somewhat comfortable with the idea that nothing that happens can be traced back to it. It’s a great racket for psychopaths. Your average serial killer/rapist wishes he could enjoy such power and seeming invulnerability to scrutiny and justice for his actions.

Ignoring this is not going to make it go away. Becoming frightened and paranoid isn’t either.

Asking questions, ignoring the lies and the distractions, recovering from what they do, and accepting the fact that heroes are punished and villains are rewarded at Chez Shit Dragon is a huge step. Educating oneself on its methods is another.

And no longer accepting what the mainstream media calls true and false is also. Because generically speaking, their sources are shit.


“There’s always been a CIA and there always will be a CIA.” –A complete ignoramus. CIA was formed in 1947. Many agencies have come and gone and been reformed since.

John Wilkes Booth was a favorite subject of Paul Barry, the founder and director of the Dodge Foundation-backed New Jersey Shakespeare Festival. As I’ve noted before, the NJSF was where CIA ran some field training using the staff at the Festival as covert training dummies as well as recruiting some of us as “mind control” puppets. It doesn’t and didn’t work like it does in the movies. It’s more like you think you’re doing what you want to do but you have someone else’s heavy influence “helping” you to decide. It wasn’t about the heavy lifting of infiltrating some Russian company’s military factory or assassinating some head of state. It was more about controlling Hollywood, Wall Street, and spying on them, occasionally harassing them, using us as distractions and scapegoats for their attempts to control it all.

As a side note, I’m confident that there’s some odd way of documenting things that defies FOIA. There’s been talk that assassination operations have always been somewhat paperless to begin with. I believe there’s some kind of tech that allows electronic data to be held but is somehow impossible to duplicate and is not attached the regular networks. This is how the really nasty stuff gets planned and executed. Classified technology itself is a FOIA exception, so imagine actually keeping non-technology related information in that format in order to hide it. That’s how they think. They learn from the past problems like Marks success in court that lead to his book The Manchurian Candidate.

But back to the point about Booth. Booth, an actor, thought that his act against Lincoln would re-start the war, reverse emancipation, and he would be welcomed as a hero in the South. While of course some were more concerned that their free labor days were over and applauded his act, take a look at what some others had to say. From Wikipedia, taken just now, before it gets edited by some anonymous IP, mostly from Kunhardt’s book:

We can set aside the debate regarding the general act of forcibly removing heads of state for a moment. The point here is, Booth’s radicalism prevented him from seeing two things clearly: First, people were sick of war. Second, it was actually Lincoln who wanted to take it easy on the South, and was holding back his cabinet who wanted to smother it in some self-righteous indignation that was more likely about their own business interests in the North which would enjoy a more even playing field since the South would now have to pay its laborers.

In other words, it backfired horribly.

Now, you might be thinking, “Well, Chris is an actor. ‘Assassinating’ a government agency {which is not really what I’m doing; I’m just grabbing some catharsis due to what they did to me while someone else does that} could easily backfire. The premiere HUMINT agency might be needed in the near future. We might have another major terror attack without them.”

Nonsense. Their name isn’t Mudd, it’s shit. They thought that everyone would be happy after they facilitated 9/11. They thought that the resulting cash cow would be more than enough to quiet anyone who wondered about an agency willing to murder so many of the citizens of the country it is supposed to be protecting would let it be. Wars must be fought. Prisoners must be tortured.

And so-called mind control must be perfected in order to reduce labor to a zero-dollar game once again. Who would complain? The elites stand to gain everything. Why worry about it? This is what is at stake.

Because, like Booth, the Central Intelligence Agency assumes everyone else is like them. To a small extent, we are; we are all pirates of some kind. We are all imperfect.

But we don’t all drown our conscience in the bathtub. We don’t all think honor is something quaint. We don’t all think an oath is something to be broken along with not only all the laws of foreign countries but our own as well. And we don’t all completely lack empathy and think slavery coming back is a good idea.

And now FBI has been drawn in. Again. As COINTELPRO really stemmed from CIA’s MHCHAOS, FBI’s got Hollywood stars in its eyes and thinks sister CIA is once again the greatest thing since sliced apple pie. It probably still isn’t getting what’s happening. Which doesn’t really bother me that much. As I noted once on Twitter, aeration is what can cause a second ship too close to one that sinks to sink as well. In many ways, it has some serious systemic institutional problems and a problematic, racist history that may be best served at least symbolically by shutting it down as well and making something else from the ground up.

The irony that CIA didn’t really understand the rest of us is, well, ironic. It is changes and challenges, such as paid labor presented to the South, that stirs up competition, and competition is what makes the economy move. Right now, still, after 17 years, fear is running the economy. Companies and investors are afraid to invest heavily because of the atmosphere CIA {and Micheal Ledeen and Saudi Intelligence} created when they made 9/11 happen. It’s stagnating the West. They are pretending that this would have happened anyway. No. It is their doing.

And I’m confident that history is going to show that getting rid of it was not only a good thing to do, but necessary. It’s in the way of every kind of progress imaginable and at the same time destroying things that ought to be preserved.

What good it is? Flush it. Flush the ChIt drAgon before it has a chance to strike again.

It probably does have contingencies planned for having its plug pulled. And we may not find them all and stop them all. But if that mentality isn’t eerily akin to “Is Paris burning?,” what is?

On the Coming Fauxpocalypse

Ful ofte in game a sooth I have herd saye!” –Chaucer

“In vino veritas.” — James Joyce

Every time I think I’ve seen it all, the thing…whatever it is…the “plan,” life, the situation, the RacCoyote Daily Briefing if you like, unfolds again and there’s more. It’s just about enough to drive you crazy if you let it.

I’ve been bothered, as I’ve mentioned before, by the seeming mockery towards Christianity and/or the Bible I’ve seen come out of whatever it is going on. Though I am not a believer like a lot of other people, I’m not militant about it like let’s say neuroscientist Sam Harris. From what I can tell, that way leads you to the same conclusion that lead to the Crusades and Spanish Inquisition. I’m more inductive/backwards than forward/deductive. Sometimes that’s an asset and not a liability.

But why is…let’s just call him the Big Guy. You can call him John Wayne, Ronald Reagan, or even my deceased uncle’s name, Jim Moore if you like. In any case, why is he, and he’s probably a true believer unlike myself. Maybe even Catholic. Why is he kinda sorta mocking religion through this crazy op?

Because he knows what someone else, also not a true believer, is planning. Even as Rove, who I no longer hate; he was just doing his job and really he is very good at it…but even as atheist Karl Rove got the religious out of their churches and into the polling booths for his party, so is something else–yes, that Shit Dragon in Langley, Virginia–attempting to unite us all through totalitarianism and austerity at such levels that we cannot really conceive of it.

When the bad guys have laid claim to “legitimate” religion, what do you have left but to poke some gentle fun at it? Really, though I’m a fairly brave guy–more through the school of hard knocks and necessity than any virtues I possessed coming in–I’m too afraid to do that. I know some radical won’t understand what I’m saying and might come shoot me because he thinks I’m trying to help usher in the anti-Christ.

Oh, the irony. I’m saying plainly that things like–shit you not–animal flu are actually designed or enhanced or spread by covert means, really not yet but this is the plan, in order to demoralize us all and make us more receptive to their coming demagogue that they hope will end all demagogues. Don’t know who that will be. Certainly a certain Saudi prince seems to be making the rounds and getting hand-kissed by everyone in sight. Saudi Arabia and Israel working together almost sounds hopeful but of course it’s about killing Yemenis and making a buck, so blame the intelligence services of those two countries as well as CIA. After all, it really was the three of them did 9/11 with Al Qaeda’s help.

Now, you’ve likely turned me off. Wait a second. You’ve seen hints of what’s possible. You see how news, and newscasters, can be manipulated. You’ve seen head-scratching mass shootings. Some you can make sense of; some you cannot. You’ve seen government defying the will of the People no matter who is in charge and you’ve seen the defiers get re-elected over and over again.

And, if you’ve paid any attention at all, you’ve seen the list under the Mind-Affecting Technology tab up top.

So, why not? Why the hell not? CIA’s objectives are not freedom, you know that. It’s not fair elections. It’s clearly not ending addiction. It’s not protecting American or any others lives, you know that. Then what is it?

It’s kissing the ass of the richest buns in the room. That’s all. They know the game: If they kiss it hard enough they will survive no matter what else happens, even if the entire government were to fall, they will be propped up in some form {Booz, we’re looking at you}, due to having helped that powerful entity or person get where they got.

I’d remind them that that didn’t work out very well for me, but they are too arrogant to much see how vulnerable and unnecessary they’ll be afterwards. They trust in their ability to be required in the new, harsh, totalitarian global regime. Maybe they’ll pull that off for a time. Who knows?

But ultimately it doesn’t have to look cartoonish. Imagine a younger Saudi prince who calls for an end to war throughout the globe and people listen. Or an even more progressive Pope. Wouldn’t most of us think that would be something to get behind?

But the real idea will be “I don’t need my slaves to fight amongst themselves any more. I just need them to do what I want. Which is any damn thing I want from here on out.”

They might even “drug” us. We might even be happy in our servitude. Maybe I’ll even forget what it is makes me so miserable and happy every day because of the neurochemical cocktail in my head. Maybe I’ll forget all this shit and enjoy my slave labor. Working with my hands is at times something I enjoy anyway. Takes my mind off of my mind.

But is this the fate we want? Why did God or Mother Nature give us “free will,” such as it is? If our minds are made up for us all the time over everything by someone else, whether it’s a news network, political party, government agency, Wall Street and multinational banks, or any number of religions or cults regardless of origin, all of which are fallible because none of their rules, even when they aren’t wrong, apply all the time to every situation–maybe that’s what consciousness is for, I don’t know…if our minds are always made up for us, what’s the point of living? Where’s the mystery, wonder, hope? What’s there to look forward to as nothing more than a servant to the deepest pocket on the planet?

Does that sound like “God’s plan”/Heaven on Earth to believers? Does that sound like Utopia to atheists?

Not with a man at the helm. I’m starting to think that a really wise superior being would know that he doesn’t know all the answers and just let us find some for ourselves. Maybe send a message and see what we do with it. Pretty clear that dread, fear, disgust and hate are not love no matter how much people who, for example, don’t understand or want to understand transgender people claim that they are. Love them first. Then talk to them about fashion. And what’s wrong with using their preferred names? Do you want to be called Bible-thumper? Why? You can teach parrots scriptures. Doesn’t mean that they understand them. Peace and love are part of it. When you work toward the opposite, simply calling it something else doesn’t change what even a dog can see is anger, and smell, is fear.

Or you could just ignore such issues and focus on something positive instead.

Yes, I’ve veered off course. But not really. This is exactly why this can and probably will happen: Because we are largely authoritarian, meaning it’s how someone says something and who says it, not what they actually say and do that really matters to most of us. If the new demagogue says to kill all of one group or another, there won’t be any stopping those filled with fear. They’ll be trying to please him because they don’t want to be the next on the hit list and they’ll be running toward it to pretend there is no kinship between them and the current targets.

That’s where it is going, folks. This is why I’m here. Even though I’d really prefer to be doing something else. Absolutely, no question about it. I like having a good time. But when bad times, past as example, current as foreshadowing, and future as nightmares we can scarcely conceive of dance in your head, kinda ruins it all.

( Well, almost all. )

So look for a new this person or that is the anti-Christ push. That’s coming as well. You really think you can talk people out of that? Not without pulling back the curtain you can’t. Not without cutting off all the funding for the Shit Dragon you won’t. I don’t care who blows the whistle any more. That won’t be enough to stop the momentum. It’s moving too quickly in this strange, new world of ours.

Your moment of truth:

and the bit about mass killing of pets:

  • Calendar

  • Search