BBD: COIN-Cidence {Updated}

“This is a rich man’s war and I don’t want any part of it.”
—Some poor sod, unfortunate enough to be alive when the War Between the States broke out, but smart enough to at least see part of the big picture, when writing to a friend


Just a list of the bizarre places/times I’ve sometimes found myself. Need to remind people again, I had nothing to do with any of these things beyond what is stated here, was merely used as scapegoat where applicable.

Context is everything. This is why when something else happens it becomes very difficult to determine what is normal life and what is covert action. That is at least in part the idea, to turn a target like myself against myself psychologically.

In the interests of brevity and simplicity, I’m not linking up any of this or including backup, evidence, etc. It’s all here in other posts, in Wicked Game, or in my possession.

1989/1990: Worked as a temp. Wound up working at Philip Morris on the shareholders meeting multimedia preparation team not long before tobacco hearings wound up causing a large shift in the board of directors.

1997/1998: The company I worked for, Professional Service Industries, Inc. {PSI} was bought by Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital. Our office was closed soon after as the main project wound down.

Late September/Early October 2001: Saw suspicious characters walking about near Gracie Mansion. Reported it and saw the response to my call.

12 October 2001: Saw Tom Brokaw at lunch at midtown restaurant with some interns. Saw he was trying to reassure them. Checked the web, saw that the Amerithrax attack on NBC had just occurred. An attempt to blame these attacks on Al Qaeda and/or Iraq will ensue. FBI director Mueller, who only took over a week before 9/11, resisted the pressure to rush to judgement by CIA and various neocons in the Bush White House. It will be determined later that it was most likely the work of Bruce Ivins, who in some ways has several uncanny similarities to Frank Olson. Olson, who worked for the US Army and CIA was allegedly murdered in the 1950s because he felt guilty about being involved as an observer in a deadly nerve gas test conducted by MI6. Olson became unstable and either jumped or was thrown out of a hotel window. Ivins, like Olson, worked at Fort Detrick and became unstable. The motive for the attacks is alleged to have been Ivins paranoia that terrorists would conduct anthrax attacks and the US was unprepared for it.

Matt Dehart claims he had evidence in the form of electronic documents from an unknown member of the hacker collective Anonymous that FBI was investigating CIA for attempting to place responsibility for the Amerithrax attacks on others. Matt’s trial is scheduled to begin on 8 December, though the Department of Justice is doing so via other charges. Matt also says he was drugged and tortured while in Canada seeking asylum. Note that just before the board determining his status made their decision, the son of one board member “went postal.”

2003/2004: A man who worked for a private defense and intelligence firm founded in 1917, Booz Allen Hamilton, was in my social circle for a time. His wife worked at the UN.

2003: Worked on a project in Helmsley Building for owner/landlord where one partner of owner company, Adam Hockfelder, wound up going to prison for fraud. My work was exclusively for the other partner, Richard N. Kalikow. Wound up getting myself removed from that project when it was clear there was shifting of money around between projects that had different investors. However, the amounts were less than 7 figures from what I could tell. Knew nothing of Hockfelder’s doings until it made the news.

2007-2008: Worked on a very fictional graphic novel script based partially on investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill’s work on Blackwater and more generally privatization including the fire department. Didn’t discover until much later that Scahill and my partner and I were neighbors. Also later discovered that yet another Booz Allen Hamilton employee lived in my condo building.

13 November 2008: One of my firm’s clients, John Paulson {not to be confused with Hank} of Paulson & Co., testified before Congress regarding the hedge fund hearings and bailouts.

September to November 2009: Worked on the so-called Ground Zero Mosque, or Cordoba House. More recently discovered that it had FBI/CIA backing and was likely staged as a wedge issue for the 2008 and 2010 elections.

October 2009: After writing and publishing what was to be the first of very fictional a mini-series comic in which the antagonist was an Ayn Rand follower type, my local comic book store was robbed. On top of the trashed mess the robbers left on the counter was a copy of my book. The owners wondered if I weren’t therefore somehow involved.

14 January 2010: My boss’ PC was hit with a worm and various trojans originating from Ford Motor Co. in Deerborn, Michigan. It is so bad that the hard drive is unusable. This follows closely on the heels of the alleged Chinese hacks of Fortune 500 companies including Google where my then partner worked. Note that before moving to operations, I was the IT manager so the attack, even though my boss thinks he clicked on a phony Classmates link, reflects badly on me.

15 January 2010?: My firm was asked by building management to expedite certain areas of the building for a building wide project. In one of these spaces the People’s Bank of China was the tenant. My co-worker and I were ushered out by several BoC employees who were moving us out in tandem.

29 January 2010: Completely fed up with the incessant and ever increasing psychological harassment–and after asking the government to put an end to it–I donated money to Wikileaks in protest. This was before Private Manning’s arrest but after the point where the government claims she began shopping documents around. I was of course completely oblivious to all of that until it made the news.

8 January 2011: When in Minneapolis doing a Google search to see if there were any movies a friend and I could go to, Google incorrectly listed my location as Arizona. This is the day Jared Lee Loughner shot 19 people.

Fall 2012: Went to a party and hit it off with a 26 year old young man whose name turned out to be James {Something other than Eagan} Holmes. Next time I saw him, he was “busy” with a looks-like-Eff-Bee-Eye guy who left the party soon after. This is eerily similar to events that lead to my one and only suicide attempt back in the 80s. The same day, a 62 year old man fell in love with me.

February-September 2013: Worked as a security guard one day a week at a plant owned by Koch Industries. This was surprising because I had, in the hopes of escaping the harassment I had endured for months at that point, run a PSYOP against Koch lobbyists in 2010 pretending that I had something to do with Hockfelder’s prosecution {again, I did not and the harassment continued}. Soon after putting in my notice, a problem at the plant lead me to think it was sabotage. More recently when I learned more about it, it seemed likely that STUXNET was used. This was during one of the allegedly Koch-engineered government shutdowns.

May 2014: When meeting with a woman who is to appear in court for a sanity/competency hearing to determine if she is to become a ward for the state {think of it as a permanent private prison sentence without the cell but all the subcontractors taking her disability income}, the man who is driving her, me, and one other man explains that he was present at the Bundy Ranch standoff. Senator Reid referred to them as domestic terrorists.

As you can see, there’s a pattern of scapegoating there. This has grown, via the destruction of my life and other events and forms of harassment, to an attempt to drive me to violence of some kind. Just as the government and private think tanks try to label all sorts of minorities as terrorists, they hoped to add LGBT to the list. Our system is that mercenary. What you see here, in Wicked Game, and  on Twitter, etc. is me fighting back. Simple as that.


Chelsea Manning Brainwashing Motive?

In reference to this from early 2012. Standard Soviet brainwashing techniques applied to Chelsea Manning while at the prison at Quantico.

Adam Klasfeld, “Manning Prosecutor Breaks Silence on WikiLeaks Case,” Courthouse News, 19 June 2015:

    “The ultimate sentence was better than what they were offering,” attorney David Coombs said in an interview.
     While the lawyers dispute the government’s willingness to return to the table, Coombs believed any deal would have required his client’s testimony against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

So the opening plea deal offer was worse than 35 years and included agreeing to suggest that there was some kind of spying conspiracy that included Wikileaks. A softening up of personality leading to less resistance to the idea might explain the treatment. Seriously, read the link at top and see how well those reports and that document line up.

The Mess That Mind Manipulation May Leave Behind

For peace and trust can win the day despite of all your losing.

First order of business, there is a must-read five part article about the son of a former NSA officer. The story is, as is mine, convoluted in turns, twists, and attempts at obfuscation on the part of our intelligence services. I really don’t want at all to make this about me, but the sheer number of similar pieces to Matt DeHart’s story that I’ve covered here before ever hearing of the guy is staggering. From Aaron Swartz’s suicide to WMD inspector Scott Ritter and others entrapped and/or smeared with regards to child pornography, to my two failed attempts to get a lawyer in Canada, once in Ontario actually hired and then later in Montreal. During this latter, I took photos of the Allan Memorial Institute at McGill University where Gail Kastner and others were experimented upon by the first president of the World Psychiatry Association, Ewen Cameron. Cameron was paid by CIA. It wasn’t until fifty years later that Kastner’s family and others finally had their day in court and won.

The attorneys for Kastner and others were the second attorneys I contacted. The first specialized in torture victims and refugees. However, his rejection of my case was due to the United Nations and other human rights watchdogs still believing that the US did not engage in torture and the persecution of its own citizens. The former is proven, of course. Let me assure you that the latter is true as well.

Then there’s the connections to Wikileaks and Anonymous, though both of my connections began after the harassment and drugging began. Speaking of drugging, there’s another connection, as I’m rather certain that happened to me as well.

Think about how well those kinds of charges coupled with what may be drug- and/or psychotropic-induced emotional issues can easily cause support to dry up. You become a leper, a pariah, and it is very, very difficult to overcome.

Check it out. Chapter 1 likewise a similarity to my case just in the title. My family is also largely military.

National Post, “Hacker, Creeper, Soldier, Spy – Chapter One: ‘My family is military’,” Adrian Humphreys, 23 May 2014:

All five parts are up now and you can read them all.

Second, I have added a “Shooter” tab at top to track various stories that relate to various plots and deaths via people exhibiting signs of mental illness along with some explanation as to why I reject the binary question of guilt/innocence due to my experiences and subsequent research. Simply because a person is disturbed does not mean that there was not also interference by a third party doing some combination of exacerbating troubles, causing the symptoms that lead to the plots and/or violent events, and attempts to control the resulting news coverage.

This is especially obvious once you study the real history, though it is often vague due to secrecy and rife with disinformation that blurs the lines of truth and lies. This is especially problematic because it sets the bar higher for exposing it, which I believe to be the main reason for this being the case. “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” some say.

In other words, is it possible to have a serous discussion on brainwashing without including space aliens, the occult, secret societies etc.? The answer is yes but it is very difficult.

The flipside to this coin is just how imperative it is that we have such a discussion. Consider the effect of CIA- and FBI-acquired Russian technology acoustic psycho-correction, for example. In less than one minute, a person’s opinion on a subject can be altered without the subject even being aware that the change wasn’t his or her idea. Imagine the implications for journalism, law, legislation, voting, even the decision to go to war. There is likewise nothing stopping NGOs from using this kind of tech nor individuals who have the money and connections.

This technology does not operate in a vacuum, however. To be truly effective, the target’s psychology must be known to some degree. Enter surveillance for this purpose, as well as associated PSYOPs to provide false data to back up the aasumptions that lead to the surreptitious change in opinion. These three types of operations, surveillance for psychological profile, psychotropic nonlethal weapon technology that inserts foreign thoughts into the target’s head, and covert operations and disinfo campaigns, work together for control.

These methods and tools are also why I say with a straight face that it is entirely possible that even Matt DeHart’s visit to the Russian embassy was not his idea, was not even a choice he could make on his own. For me, there are a few examples, but the most dramatic and “out there” was undoubtedly crossing a bridge under construction in order to visit a fictional person. I had aquaphobia and acrophobia before this. Does that sound like something else is bigger than fear, or what?

Of course that was years ago and I would never do anything that cra–

And last year I quit my job and moved to Chicago because I saw this video * :

WeAreChange, The Persecution of Jeremy Hammond

And wanted an answer to a question. **

It is not as if most of this has not been tried before. The Church hearings made it clear that the law was abandoned due to irrational fears on the parts of the Executive branch, members of Congress, field agents and officers, and the public at large. Whereas this was previously due to the Red Scare, it is now also due to Islamophobia and Climate Change panic.

It is not that there wasn’t something of concern in totalitarian foreign governments, minority sects of radical, murderous groups who use religion as an excuse regardless of label, and I’m certainly a believer in climate change.

No, the problem is opportunists taking advantage of these fears to create rifts in the law and to take a crowbar constructed of fear, secrecy, greed, and intimidation to enlarge those gaps. The larger these gaps become, the more lawless the country is, the more abuse and atrocities occur, the less confidence people have in government and industry, and taken to the extreme end, the dissolution of societal cohesion can and will occur.

What’s changed is the advances in the methods and the knowledge gap of the public at large about them. Some authoritarians say that they don’t want to know. It’s going to affect you now, already had probably and you don’t know it, if only indirectly. You cannot afford to bury your head in the sand or lay down and put a bag over your head until it’s over.

Can there be a bigger issue? Some would say that the collapse of the American Empire would be a good thing. I see their point where the ability to wage endless war, protect corprorate crime, torture and other abuse at the expense of education and positive infrastructure repair is concerned. The problem, of course, is what will take its place? Almost certainly the militaristic domination by a few multinationals who have been hoarding money like it’s the end of the world. I suppose there’s yet another fear to be cashed in on and, really, we are hardwired for that through evolution.

Doesn’t mean it’s true. Doesn’t mean it must go down in a horrific way. Doesn’t mean we have to resort to violence to resolve it, though that is certainly history’s lesson for the most part.

Maybe it’s time to grow up by nurturing a childlike, but not childish, imagination in a positive way. This requires courage. It also requires faith or, to borrow again from the late Douglas Adams, “Don’t Panic.”

It also requires something of an awakening. This is about a struggle with power and how it manifests itself. We, the rest of us, are where power bases itself. We are. A full understanding of this puts an end for the most part of in-fighting. If we’re divided and fighting amongst each other, how are we to stand together and remind power that it doesn’t exist in a vacuum either?

See through the lies accept that it’s worse than you think but don’t succumb to the fear that that would engender.

No matter who or what you may think is behind that portion of our troubles that are not naturally occurring, it is  imperative that attention is drawn to at a minimum the portions of this technology and methods that are not even classified but zealously kept from public scrutiny. Can we afford to take the chance that what I’m suggesting is true, or at least partially so, and fail to act due to fear of being labeled “tinfoil hat?” There’s decades of history on this that includes for example, as much as it sounds cartoonish, the use of former nazi scientists at Fort Detrick, Maryland. This trend also involves Voice of America and everything from rocket science to things like GLADIO. Some spy-related programs are cliche for a reason.



* Luke was arrested yesterday in Denmark for being in the hotel where the Bilderberger group was meeting. He is reportedly out of custody but I’m not sure about his friend Dan who was also arrested.

Luke also reported once receiving a trick link that attempted to put kiddie porn on his phone just before a security search.

** By the way, up shot was getting out of that job. Know I scare people, can’t be helped if I’m also going to be a truthteller, but I assure you it’s not as simple as being a robot. We can all be manipulated. Sometimes it takes another person to point that out when it happens. And we can turn the opposition’s plans against them. Trust me, do it all the time.

Hope you’re doing ok.

Mass Effect

Or, “How Dare You Change the Subject, Mr. Bond?”

In passing, let me relate one organized stalking phenomenon that generally does not help those targeted by it. In a similar fashion to mistaking technology and tricks available to DoD/CIA/NSA/FBI, private subcontractors, and oligarchs for being so advanced that it simply must involve the aid of some advanced alien civilization, they fall for a trick using mass media. As has been shown before, CIA and British intelligence have hired magicians in the past in order to solve specific problems, like how to slip someone a drug or how to fool the Nazis into thinking there’s a massive buildup of troops and military vehicles and planes where there is none and hiding the real one. This latter not only was a real part of WWII history, but the novel and film Eye of the Needle centered around it:


But what I mean for these people, some targeted for a reason and others for simple target practice, is the idea that something on the news, in movies or tv shows, or song lyrics, were written/said/presented for the target specifically. Though it would not surprise me if on occasion that is actually done, most of the time it’s a trick of the mind turning on itself as a result of the isolation and trauma, surreptitious drugging, electronic assault, or some combination.

I was lucky early on when, around February of 2010, I picked up a book of Harvard poetry from the 1910s and laughed as it seemed as though some of it applied so well to me. The secretly applied drugs, hypnotic suggestion, or something else I can’t nail down, I don’t know. But it is a trick, whatever the direct cause and they are aware of it. I tend to lean towards drug-induced “brain fart” since that may be what inspired Jung regarding his obsession with synchronicity.

In any case, one of the intentional side effects designed to undermine credibility.

But, that’s not the main point. The main point is the opposite, except not being aimed at one person but rather as the guerrilla warfare manual suggests, everyone.

During the Cold War, Ian Fleming’s James Bond novels were contraband in the Soviet Union. LeCarre has discussed this more than a few times: there’s a double-edged sword at work. On the one hand, you seduce Russian youth with visions of easy sex, fast cars, fine foods and liquor…you know, “freedom.” On the other, LeCarre pointed out, such a real spy would quickly become dependent on those “perks” and quickly work for whichever side offers the best of all those things.

Move to today. Hello, private intelligence community revolving door. Not only the Top Secret America contractors, who actively pursue getting around the Constitution whenever possible, but serve the Oligarchy often at the expense of the 99%. And perhaps worse where the rise of radical theocrats endorse murder of people with whom they.disagree on lifestyle–right out of Congress’ COINTELPRO report by the way–but also radical jihadis and neonazis. Not to mention the varied attempts to radicalize via Alex Jones, etc. that I’ve mentioned before.

So it is strange to note that we went from this obvious anti-multinational corporate fascism:



To making leaks, Wikileaks, and Julian Assange the villains:


Really kind of odd, because the Organization and Mr. White story arch was supposed to go for four or five films. Or is it odd? Or have our spies accepted that they will be better taken care of by the multinationals than serving their communities? The answer seems obvious.

In closing, an apology to Mr. Assange. I’m guessing you recall the letter or can find it. As noted above, really was not in my right mind at the time. Additionally, you were right, I was wrong:

Techdirt, “US Military Admits No One Died Because Of Manning’s Leaks,” Mike Masnick, 31 July 2013:

The Nation, “A Long List of What We Know Thanks to Private Manning,” Greg Mitchell, 23 August 2013:

That time. Stated my opinion this time on Twitter. Maybe I’m wrong again. Time will tell. Just beware the obvious trap. Of course if they don’t move a finger to secure the facilities within the time allotted, guess we’ll know how important the operation really is as compared to the propaganda they may seek to use it for.

The Future is Now

Or, “Welcome to my world. It’s your world, too.”

Normally, I save the suckerpunch for the end of the post in an attempt to leave the reader reeling from the final slap in the hopes of some sort of awakening from zombielike stupor. In this case, I’m leading with it choosing rather to pummel after the first dizzying blow with the lesser jab backup material gathered over recent days mostly via the Twitters.

So many links after the fold.

Continue reading

It’s Never What You Think

Limited time, so I’m keeping this short. These beginning notes have already been mentioned here and/or on Twitter (@kanyslupin), so I’m not relinking them. See BoilingFrogsPost and the Corbett Report for GLADIO and NATO’s role as shadow government in most of the world at this point. See VeteransToday for some of the chemical attack information.

We have reports that the sarin nerve gas attack was the work of the UK, Israel, and top Pentagon officials. What’s the common denominator there? NATO.

What has NATO been called out for? Operation Gladio. The running of all terrorist organizations and radical and even non-radical groups (if they don’t found them, they infiltrate, take over, and turn them militant) including Britain’s IRA and Italy’s Red Brigade.

Meanwhile, NATO officials are saying that they don’t want to attack Syria. This is of course how I know that they do. In the same way they use those groups as proxies, they are using the US, UK, Israeli, French, and Canadian proxies to push for it. They can sit back and let them all take the blame when it unsurprisingly turns bad.

My larger point in this post, though, relates to one of the Barrett Brown quotes in the previous post, and how I’ve said time and time again (examples, Heath Ledger, Dem nephew who fell asleep in Afghanistan and committed suicide, see “16-Knockout Pill” tag, and more) we ask the wrong questions.

Voice-to-skull and related technologies are the game changer. Now, the real culprits can sit back and do whatever they damn well please while someone else (usually an enemy) takes the fall for it.

For example, the video allegedly given to Wikileaks by Chelsea Manning. Even Stephen Colbert called Julian Assange out on the fact that some of those killed were carrying rocket launchers.

What’s missing? Why they were carrying rocket launchers and further why the Department of Defense lied through it’s teeth (see Brown’s True/Slant discussion on this, especially here starting with “Update: The Weekly Standard Makes a Hilarious Mistake”) when their official report said that this occurred in the middle of a fire fight.

There was no fire fight. The pilots can be heard going out on a search and destroy mission.

What about the reporters? First, were they interviewing some people who had rocket launchers? Does that make them fair game for being murdered? Second, maybe the items were part of a story. Maybe they were moving them (finding them left behind) away from an area where there were children. Maybe V2K was used on them first so that better judgement would not be applied, just has it was in my case many, many times, that of Barrett Brown and the YouTube video, Peter Watts and Officer Beaudry at the Port Huron-Sarnia border, and countless others I’ve suggested that this might be the case.

This is the holy grail of fascists, this technology. They can plant ideas in your head without you even realizing that they did so. Shouldn’t that be considered the most serious threat to civilization imaginable? Isn’t it? Truly?

Here again is Defense Electronics, “DoD, Intel Agencies Look at Russian Mind Control”, Mark Tapscott, July 1993:

In a series of closed meetings…FBI officials were briefed on the decade-long research on a computerized acoustic device allegedly capable of implanting thoughts in a person’s mind without that person being aware of the thought.

The similar Defense News article is at top.

It is impossible to prove me wrong. It is very, very likely that what I am suggesting is correct. Microwaves and radiowaves don’t leave a trace. Perfect assassination tool. Perfect political fix-it tool. Perfect revenge tool.

It’s a threat to everything. I don’t care what your philosophy is (unless of course it’s fascism, in which case you’re getting what you want) this is a threat to it.

I got nothing else.

BBD – Why and Who’s Barrett Brown?

First, I’m going to lay out a bit more of the who-and-why where my persecution by the US government is concerned. I have recently been commenting here and there about some of the why’s and they sound contradictory. I don’t think they are, they merely have a structure or hierarchy.

By way of example, if someone sets vicious dogs upon you because they didn’t like something you said, do you think the dogs have the same motive for attacking you? No. The dogs do so because they have been beaten to be vicious, obedient, and s— rolls down hill.

The biggest portion is of course that every powerful organization is using voice-to-skull and similar technology combined with other methods for varied purposes, most of which boil down to making money and covering up past crimes committed in order to make money.

The elephant in the room, of course, may be 9/11. Presence of military, CIA, and corporate special interests in Afghanistan from the 80s and through the 90s gave them opportunity. The technology (publicly acknowledged as existing in the US since 1993, where they try to make it sound as if the Russians invented it and the US was clueless with the Defense News and Defense Electronics articles I’m fond of pointing out to people) is the weapon, along with of course the more mundane things like PSYOPs and the good old double-cross in order to make sure that they are so pissed off that they will, somehow, somewhere, definitely attack the US and her interests abroad.

This is the same methodology employed domestically now against individuals and groups. I know, they exploded my life (and tried to make it seem as though it was over support of a defendant in a court case).

We’re going to assign that to CIA/DoD.

Next, we have the writing of The Wisp. For all it’s silliness and over-the-top story, it still at the heart of it had some points to be made about the privatization of the military, the intelligence community, police, and fire departments. I did not know about Top Secret America at the time. I knew about Blackwater, of course, but that was supposed to be a response to 9/11. There was of course more to it than that (Erik Prince’s partner left the company because he believed Prince was more focused on profits than quality of service; the company began as a police shooting training company).

But the idea that a comic book written by someone with a few tenuous but not necessarily impossible to use connections in the entertainment industry, or a film based on the same might point out that this whole privatization thing could be bad for America? Well, now that the strong-arming going on in Hollywood over war history is more clear and the subsequent attacks on other writers and now journalists, I think that quite possible.

Additionally, and this had been to my mind a last minute plot twist, not even something I thought was true (but possible in a narrative given the psychology of such men), that there might be brokers who were playing both the terrorists and the mercenaries. And that the mercenaries might even be aware of that. That wasn’t explicit in the story, but the same character supplies King with a tactical nuke and the terror cell towards the end with the explosive van.

Then there was torture. There were of course stories in the news about waterboarding by then but I’m thinking they didn’t want to see a main protagonist character be the one having it done to him.

That kind of thing (“good” torture) is reserved in Hollywood for the Muslims, of course, or criminals in action movies. That is, until it becomes vogue to do it to whomever else the growing fascist movement in the US can get away with doing it to, eg, Mexicans, LGBT, atheists, journalists, intellectuals, scientists, and anyone else who’s smarter than a nazi thug.

That also probably wasn’t fitting the bill for the people running today’s MOCKINGBIRD machine (speaking of which, must be linked).

Now you have a second level but this time targeting the private security and paramilitary firm.

Given their name popping up twice in my old personal life, I’m going to go with Booz Allen on this second-tier series of attacks. It is not impossible that the first issue was what lead to this one. Pitting people against each other is how the game is played and so there could be issues between BA and a competitor or a government entity.

Then, after all of that, there came the Wikileaks connection (via a donation in January 2010, before the Manning story hit and Cablegate happened), and by extension, to Manning and Anonymous, and therefore Barrett Brown and the brothers Hammond.

I’m going to go with this being how CIA, DoD, BA and/or whoever else decided to let FBI loose on me did so, or how FBI, knowing about either the first issue, the second, or both, decided to fake their way towards an arrest. Now that that has failed, it’s all about the drive to suicide.

To summarize:

CIA/DoD – MKULTRA coverup
Top Secret America’s Booz Allen and/or Team Themis, etc. – MOCKINGBIRD control of entertainment esp. as related to outsourcing
FBI – COINTELPRO activities to coverup something above or duped into believing it was about something other than what it actually was

(And of course they are all NSA “clients”, can ask for information and get it.)

Let’s look at this again. Some serious possibilities where exposing not only 9/11 as a false-flag attack, but possibly any number of other violent or strange acts that have occurred that have lead us and continue to lead us to a political climate not unlike 1930s Germany.

Now, out of all this mess, who do you think they really want to nail? Whose whistle would actually blow the loudest? Whose story would make the most waves?

Which brings me to what else I didn’t know.

Barrett Brown is a journalist. He is:

1) Not only been incarcerated for a year over a trap…

(That’s what it was. Someone made sure that the credit card information came along with the Stratfor emails so it would look like a financial crime and not simply whistleblowing journalism. Recall what I’m talking about here, didn’t have to be intentional on the part of anyone but the trappers. As a friend of Brown’s said: “If the Pentagon Papers included credit-card info, then would The New York Times have been barred from researching them?” They, like Brown’s commenters he once compared to the sharks in Deep Blue Sea, learn. They learn from the past and try not to repeat it by making it seem like the past pattern, but actually being a staged, controlled situation. Kinda makes you wonder who f—ed Straftor, though doesn’t it?).

2) …not only faces 105 years in prison…

(This is more time than serial child rapist-murderers and people who sold secrets to the USSR. Which should come as no surprise since the US government regularly murders children with drones and pretty much f—s everyone whenever it can regardless of age, and selectively prosecutes traitors–which I call treason after the fact.)

3) …but also is forbidden from speaking to the media about his case.

(This is not a terrorism case where that old excuse of “code words” to trigger terror attacks is used to prevent the legal process from being examined by the people for which it supposedly works. They just don’t want the truth to come out.)

Ergo, we lock up journalists when we don’t like what they write, when they get too close to the truth just like a banana republic or the former Soviet Union.

That truth is that there is a corporatist (aka fascist) conspiracy on behalf of certain large corporations to prevent these same entities from being held responsible for breaking the law; protecting them from damages resulting from harm they have caused; to create conditions such that cheap labor is the norm thereby gutting the middle class and ultimately reducing benefits either in quantity or quality; to increase industries’ stranglehold on the political process while reducing that of the citizen; to achieve some other political goals that may help in future endeavors; and–you really had better wrap your head around this one–population reduction. That is their solution to climate change which they themselves (the Defense Department and many industries) have caused.

That’s why Barrett Brown is in prison. They finally got him because the FBI threatened his mother with prison and Brown lost his cool, threatened the FBI officer in charge.

Does that remind you at all of Jonathan Rhys Meyers at the airport? Does me. Yes. Why not? They don’t have to use the law as their limit, they are the Department of Justice. Zap Brown with MEDUSA or V2K, provoke him by threatening his mother, provide the ideas for the video subliminally, and then you go arrest him because some CEO doesn’t like where he’s poked his nose.

This is not a government for, by, nor of the people. It’s a kleptocracy just like Russia.

Why Jeremy Hammond is in prison is because he, he has now plead guilty to it, was the one who downloaded the data from the Stratfor servers. He plead guilty because they threatened him with more years and the double jeopardy loophole of just taking him from state to state until someone found him guilty.

This is our federal government. Under Barack Obama.

But then comes the question as to why, in July of this year, Jason Hammond, Jeremy’s fraternal twin, was arrested. He is accused of attacking (along with nearly twenty others) a group of people dining. He was held with a $100,000 bail (and could not get out by raising the 10% bond that most of us are used to thinking of as the number, he had to have the whole $100,000).

Of course I knew next to none of this until he was released just recently. I can’t help thinking there’s a reason for that.

Similarly, the Hammond brothers’ father was busted under similar circumstances to those that I have detailed here and in Wicked Game regarding WMD expert and Iraq war critic Scott Ritter.

The pattern is so strong I can’t believe I’m the only one talking about it.

Though I should note that there is talk about emails containing kiddie porn being sent to journalists and attorneys, which would serve to embarrass, discredit, perhaps ruin if it were found during a border crossing or other search. It might even push some people (read=authoritarians) towards Michael Hayden’s whining for a digital Blackwater so he and his cronies can make money and prevent you from reading things like this at the same time. (That man has a dream. It just happens to look more like Mein Kampf meets The Great Train Robbery every day).

The circumstances of Jason’s arrest are odd. He was supposedly at a completely different protest at the time of the diner attack (on white supremacists or some hereditary society gathering to eat). Five men, all from Indiana, were arrested almost immediately. Jason was arrested a year later. His friends claim he could not have been there and that the kind of thing that went down was not in any case the kind of activity he engages in (the record would seem to support that; he and Jeremy tore up Rahm’s paper sign to try to get the Olympics to Chicago; they did not hit supporters of the Olympics, of which their father is one, with hammer and batons).

There’s also talk that this might have been a massive set up. Suppose most of the people in those black uniforms were FBI. They can accuse whoever they want, arrest and hold them for as long as they want, pressure false confessions out of them, and just keep doing it until they run out of suspects. Then do it again somewhere else.

This is not in the realm of the impossible. This is what these people have shown me that they are capable of. This is what this country is really like behind the cable TV screen.

And that in turn reminds me of the “Great Werewolf Robbery of Port Huron.” One person, in that case, a young man, committed a robbery. Police were more interested in getting revenge (it seemed) for the Squidgate trial and so talked the robber into stating that the Squidgate juror who wrote a letter on behalf of the convicted did it. It was bizarre.

Same pattern here. Use one crime to frame someone else because you want them put away but don’t actually have anything to arrest them for.

Congratulations, Barack Obama. You’ve been de-elevated to despot.

So, why? What did they want from Jason?

The Janus deception (there you go, Ludlum, have at it) was designed to trigger the connection between these two and whoever it was I saw. They waited until now.

Jeremy Hammond’s trial is set for November and the judge in the case did not recuse herself even though her husband’s email and password were among those hacked.

Trippety, trappety…

While I can’t say that the coverup is worse than 9/11, it sure is nasty.

Here’s a good roundup of Barrett Brown’s situation. These are the 20 articles that the government used as examples for the judge to show why protecting a criminal corporate intelligence community was so important to protect over the public’s right to know.

I have to also point out the similarity (though he is much smarter, better educated, and ten times the writer I am) between Brown’s sense of humor where poking fun at CNN and the MSM goes, interest in this cabal of fascist private spook companies, and being gay while also having spent time in the South.

Brown about CNN:

The word “Russia” does not appear on the main page of, and in fact if one searches this most telling of websites for that term, one will not find anything on these nationwide demonstrations – although one will indeed have the opportunity to learn that a Moscow fire chief died, reasonably enough, in a fire, fires being among those occurrences which our nation’s less ethical news producers have determined to be of perpetual interest to their respective audiences. Perhaps the protesters should have started their own fire. I’m kidding, of course; they should have abducted a small Caucasian girl and thus gained de facto control of Fox News for a month, a tactic more easily executed than actually seizing control of a domestic television station in the traditional manner.

On the value of Wikileaks:

It would have been a fine thing for the public to have learned of MKULTRA, Tuskagee, COINTELPRO, Operation Ajax, and other state-sanctioned acts of malevolence early enough to have put an end to them, rather than years later and by way of such things as the Church Commission or delayed declassification.

On the lack of value of the mainstream media:

Despite having recently finished an entire book on the deficits of the U.S. media, I can say that the extraordinary failure of the major outlets to cover the Wikileaks/DoD cover-up story as of this writing constitutes perhaps the best evidence I have yet to see that the American mainstream news media is absolutely broken and that most of those working as editors and producers within this system are guilty of such cowardice and negligence that one must wonder how quickly this nation would collapse if any actual bravery were required to prevent it by way of reportage.

Brown on what was happening with Stratfor, Booz Allen, NSA, etc., the big picture:

This is the world that we accept if we continue to avert our eyes. And it promises to get much worse.

  • Calendar

    • June 2019
      M T W T F S S
      « Feb    
  • Search